Delta_V @ Delta_V @lemmy.world

Posts

32

Comments

386

Joined

2 yr. ago

look at Mr Moneybags over here, able to afford a van down by the river

That extra weight will also mean that more force is required to accelerate and change directions.

The nimbleness of a vehicle can be expressed as the ratio:

(Tire Contact Area * Tire Stickiness) / Vehicle Mass

Increasing the vehicle's mass while making the tires harder will lead to longer breaking distances and will cause a vehicle to understeer at lower speeds.

In a world with too many humans already, can you imagine painting a drop in the birth rate as somehow a bad thing?

lol

So this big breakthrough in tire technology is . . . making them harder and reducing their grip?

There’s no reason EVs have to be heavier forever

That's a bit of a stretch, unfortunately. The energy density of batteries is nowhere close to that of gasoline - joule for joule, gasoline weighs about 100 times less than batteries. Also, a fuel tank big enough to give its vehicle a 400 mile range will get lighter over the course of the trip, as the liquid fuel gets converted into polluting gas and exhausted into the atmosphere - batteries don't get appreciably lighter as you discharge them.

Agree that 400 miles range with charging stations as ubiquitous as today's gas stations would help EV adoption. I do worry about the rollout of charging stations being slowed down by competition with expensive and fragile hydrogen tech (keep the hydrogen on boats and trains pls).

plot twist, cleaning up the source of that contamination would mean a local business endures lower profit margins. the bureaucrat who's job it was to push the Approved! button got chased away from their terminal by a guy in a rubber mask who brought a fog machine and a projector

You gotta wonder WTF the French were thinking when they decided to force people into the sweltering insomnia of 80 degrees indoors at night just for the sake of creating the appearance that climate change is the fault of the dispossessed proletariat running air conditioners to survive global heating, and pretending like the owners of the means of production aren't actually in a position to change how the economy functions.

run on "government bad"

get elected

govern poorly

"told you so"

you mean the patriarchy?

This legit sounds like bioweapons testing on the public.

096 has breached containment

That’s just a fucking blatant lie. Obamacare is free if your income is low enough.

This is also factually inaccurate. If your income is low enough, then I know from experience that the sign up process for the ACA will redirect you to Medicaid.

I believe that you believe that you're telling the truth, but it seems like you've been misinformed. In reality, you've asked me to disregard my own lived experience and to ignore the evidence provided by my own lying eyes.

I'm in it. Right now. Trying to get healthcare as a poor person in USA.

Your replies make it seem like you are not - like you're out of touch and apparently believe its easier to be poor in USA than it actually is. A poor person in USA can get free healthcare, but you have to stay poor to keep it. If your income grows to about 1 standard deviation below the median, which is still less than a living wage, then you'll lose access to Medicaid and have to shop for an ACA plan in the marketplace. Those marketplace plans became garbage after the Republicans repealed the important parts of 'obamacare'.

That's factually inaccurate.

The cheapest plans cost hundreds of dollars per month and have deductibles that make you pay thousands of dollars out of pocket before the insurance company will pay out a cent. Its worse than just not having any insurance - not only are you still paying full price for healthcare, but you're also out hundreds of dollars a month paying the premiums for an insurance policy that doesn't actually cover anything unless you happen to have thousands of dollars in the bank to pay the deductibles.

If you make enough money that you can afford to pay the premiums and deductibles for even the cheapest of ACA plans, or if you're so out of touch and far removed from shopping for ACA plans as a poor person that you're not aware of just how expensive they are and how little they cover, perhaps it is you who needs to re-evaluate how privileged you are.

The ACA was good the first year it existed, but deductibles and premiums have both since increased beyond the point of usefulness.

The value of stocks has no direct impact on the volume of currency that exists, and printing literal paper money is only a tiny fraction of the new currency generated by the banking system. The person you replied to is correct. Most new money is created by banks:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking

As banks hold in reserve less than the amount of their deposit liabilities, and because the deposit liabilities are considered money in their own right (see commercial bank money), fractional-reserve banking permits the money supply to grow beyond the amount of the underlying base money originally created by the central bank.

For example, if banking regulators set the 'reserve ratio' at 1:10, and you deposit $1,000 at your bank, then your bank would be able to give out loans worth $10,000. The effect on the volume of currency that exists is the same as if the US Mint printed an additional $9,000.

One of the problems with that system is that all that money is owed back to the bank + interest. However, there's not actually enough currency in existence to pay back all the loans + interest, so the banks inevitably get to confiscate people's property when they default on loans. Remember that the banks invented that money from thin air via fractional reserve lending - now they've turned that thin air into physical, tangible wealth at no cost to them.

Another problem with that system is that big loans - i.e. new currency entering the system - take time for their full inflationary effects to be felt. The "people" who get the big loans can spend the new currency at its full value, but by doing so they put enough new currency into circulation to devalue it via inflation.

One of the consequences of the fractional reserve lending system is that increasing the 'reserve ratio' will decrease the rate of inflation. Less new loans are issued, so less new currency enters the system. The banking lobby does not want this to become common knowledge, for obvious reasons. Federal taxes can be eliminated entirely, and the regulatory effect those taxes would have had on inflation can be substituted by taking it out of the banker's profits by reducing the amount of new currency the banks are adding to the economy via fractional reserve lending.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_monetary_theory

a thin layer of positive mass tucked inside an outer layer of negative mass

If the universe provides negative mass, maybe we could use it to build an FTL warp drive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive

Those with money, who take that money and the time/effort to help others, are less hated.

Are they really though? They got that money by stealing it - over charging customers and under paying workers. Thieves who return a small fraction of what they stole to the people they took it from are not altruistic.

why the hell would Mozilla be obliged to acknowledge this request?

That's what I've been scratching my head about too. What leverage does Russia have to force them to do this? What consequences could they impose for non-compliance?

Does Mozilla own property in Russia? Sell it or write it off, then ignore the censorship request.

Do they have employees who live or have family in Russia? Either fire them or help them move, then ignore the censorship request.

None of the above? Perhaps it is we who need to fire Mozilla then.

Ironic. We could afford more flags and guns if we had a single payer healthcare system and stopped overpaying for terrible insurance that doesn't actually cover you when you need it.

Also, its probably safe to assume the producers will lie about how much they're allowing to leak into the air.