I recently migrated most of my homelab to Proxmox running on a pair of x86 boxes. I did it because I was cutting the streaming cord, and wanted to build a beefy Plex capability for myself. I also wanted to virtualise my router/firewall with OPNsense.
Once I mastered Proxmox, and truly came to appreciate both the clean separation of services and the rapid prototyping capability it gave me, I migrated a lot of my homelab over.
But, I still use RasPis for a few purposes: Frigate server, second Pi-hole instance, backup Wireguard server. I even have one dedicated to hosting temperature sensors, reed switches, and webcams for our pet lizard's enclosure.
Or, maybe, they could address the terrible cost of living crisis that's facing hard-working families in Australia. Start with kicking Colesworth up the arse for profiteering, then the energy sector.
I switched to using using Obtainium to install directty from dev repos as much as possible, and am adding Fossify's projects as they release. IMO, It's the best way to ensure you get the app you want, without letting middle-men push their agenda or mine your data.
OP searched for Fossify - the Simple fork. That's the point here - the new owner of Simple has added the keyword 'fossify' so they turn up in the search results, which no doubt prioritises apps with higher install counts.
what LNP are actually doing is very different to what they said on the campaign trail
Their Victorian branch literally just pulled support for what was a bipartisan promise for an Indigenous Treaty - something that had been promised for years.
Until the LNP gets rid of their conservative, gutless, old, white, male policy-makers, we'll never progress as a society. And I'm an (almost) old, white male.
Saved me the effort, thanks. Although, couldn't you just block the container from talking outside your network? I can't see why I'd need a memo app (server) to have access to the internet.
This is a tough one, that takes practice and mental discipline.
You've already acknowledged that you can't change how things ended with this individual. Right now, you're in a very natural place for humans to be: you're feeling powerless, like someone has done something to you, and you want to blame that other person for how you're feeling.
The bit that takes practice and discipline is that you CAN change how you choose to react to things like this. You can take accountability for your reactions and emotions.
Why is this irritating you so much? What is it about the exchange that annoyed you, and makes you wish you could reply? If you had the chance to reply, would you want to do the same thing - reply and block - or continue arguing? To what end? What outcome is it that you want?
Accepting reality starts with acknowledging there are things you can't change. You've already said that, so you know this is the right path to continue going down.
The bit you need to try and take accountability for is understanding why you're feeling the way you are. This isn't about the person "robbing you" of the chance to reply. It's about why you feel so strongly that you need to reply.
Until you know why this pissed you off so much, you can't take meaningful steps to getting yourself into a better emotional state.
Edit: I feel bad that your OP is getting downvoted. You've asked a legitimate question about mental health, and some people are clearly writing you off as you having a whinge.
Yeah, Google Wallet and my banking app. Secondarily, access to my work emails and Slack. I'm on the move so much during the day, my laptop rarely leaves my backpack sometimes.
Yep, good point. That's still a bit of a dick move, but a completely legitimate one too. If you don't like people like us having a play and developing our own capabilities against the service, you can re-assert your ownership and lock it down.
Siccing lawyers onto a dev who is helping your customers use your product in new and improved ways is just plain fucking stupid.
I reckon it's probably not that much. There has to be tens of thousands of customers worldwide that are using their shitty app.
Forks and stars on the original repo numbered only in the hundreds.
Cloud services and API gateways usually charge once you get into the millions of requests. Amazon API Gateway doesn't even charge for having the APIs active - only for the requests that are received and the data transferred out.
I'm finding it very difficult to believe a few hundred HA users even came close to putting a dent in their cloud bill.
I think it's because the dev might've reverse-engineered the calls to the cloud service, and that may be where the legal sticking point is. Not a lawyer, so not 100% sure - will be interesting to see where this goes.
I saw elsewhere the dev has insurance, and they're going to cover a lawyer, so they may very well fight it.
Yeah - they need to hear this a lot. They could absolutely have taken a little time to understand what need the dev was filling here. Ultimately, this could've been a free kick for them, had they handled it the right way.
I mean, I'm going to give Monsieur Spade a try. But not because of some shitty streaming service recommendation like this - that's terrible.