Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DE
Posts
1
Comments
163
Joined
8 mo. ago

  • It's been almost 10 years since Bernie was screwed out of the primary.

    If progressives give a shit about actually fixing this country they will not be allowed to do that from within the Democratic party.

    We need a third party, and if progressives aren't interested in splitting then they are complicate in the status quo

  • Or we could perpetually redistribute the excess wealth of the rich so everyone can have proportional spending power again.

    Ir we could tie min wage to inflation.

    There's better ways of fixing income inequality than making everyone unemployed and homeless, but i guess it's time humanity learn this economic lesson AGAIN instead of making correct decisions.

  • *at the cost of widespread unemployment

    They are siphoning all the money into corporations and then using the success of corporations (GDP) to evaluate their success.

    Well they sure did make the GDP go up and now everyone is unemployed.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Yeah i understand that.

    They shouldn't have ever drawn attention to a bad economy in the first place, especially if that means trying to phrase a bad economy as a good thing, even if relatively speaking the economy was good

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The economy was better than under Trump.

    The economy was bad instead of horrible, because of the ripples of Covid still fucking with the economy.

    Having a bad economy and pointing at it like it is something to campaign on was a huge mistake, it wasn't a horrible economy, but it was far from good.

    For regular people a good economy means their spending power proportionally increased. And in a tangible way.