Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DA
Posts
7
Comments
1,144
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • No it's not, the coup already happened. This is a robbery, and one even I could pull off. Fed system withdrawals, straight into monero accounts, later converted to Bitcoins, then cash.... So because monero is untraceable everything after that is untraceable. Maybe they'll add a coin tumbler, but in all likelihood they wouldn't have to. So more likely they just automate it and suddenly all be revealed to be billionaires later.

  • Is that the appropriation bill that fills the annual budget? Would the OBM be more like, allocation of those funds? I don't know much about this stuff.

    Would dems even have the votes to "shut down the government" that way? Is that in June/July?

  • Not trying to be a dick, but I figured Algae is still a carbon based life form... So I googled and it said: Uptake of CO2 by algae is approximately twice of the weight of algae.

    But I assume other stuff is doing most of the heavy lifting... I think I remember something about coral forests, just trying to ask people who know more - what's taking up all that carbon? Is algae a threat to it?

    P.S looked it up, apparently seagrasses and mangroves absorbed the most carbon in the ocean, and Algae van risk sea grass by shading it too much... I still suspect they're not totally at odds, because it didn't say anything about being a direct threat, just making too much shade.... Anyways. I'm sure others will comment.

    EDIT: oh, maybe it's that sea grass is more stable in its effects/consumption of carbon. Where as Algae patches probably float and fluctuate, or die off... But that probably fertilizes other stuff... I guess this is all why "sustainable" solutions are the focus...

  • I imagine that as a formality Musk's recommendations go past Trump, then to Russell Vought who is head of the OBM (office of management and business), and the actual official in charge of funding allocations.

  • So when we say Climate Change is an immediate and irreversible threat... There's another clause there that's something like: but not to us right now as a species, more to the biodiversity that would be put at risk if we tried producing more Algae? So we're not going to address the "immediate and irreversible threat" in that way (use of algae), because it might upset other things in the ocean.

    Would those other things be stuff like... Er... Important stuff. I'm just not sure about this stuff because I don't know that much about Climate Change in relation to Algae and Oxygen production.... And what/when the threat would warrant it.

  • Also, there's a bunch of ways to make Algae blooms in the ocean. Apparently even just dumping a bunch of iron dust in the ocean would cause lots of algae blooms - but we don't do it.

  • Well, it's not like Zionists with dual allegiances have worked their way into most governments... Oh wait, they have? Well okay then.

    ...and their message is pretty uniform: Criticism of Zionism is Antisemitic, and they'll use their positions to prosecute that agenda.

  • Neo-Liberalism: Let's hire anyone from anywhere, just the best candidates no matter what, no other values but who we can extract the most value from. Let's also take money from the government and lobby them to defund themselves and the country's services to give us even more money.

    Oh wow! How does China steal our tech?! Why wasn't the government funding education and security to protect us?!?