DahGangalang @ DahGangalang @infosec.pub

Posts

1

Comments

398

Joined

2 yr. ago

mUh FaMiLy!!1!

and exercise caution when you're unsure

I don't think that fully encapsulates a counter point, but I think that has the beginnings of a solid counter point to the argument I've laid out above (again, it's not one I actually devised, just one that really put me on my heels).

The ability to recognize when it's out of its depth does not appear to be something modern "AI" can handle.

As I chew on it, I can't help but wonder what it would take to have AI recognize that. It doesn't feel like it should be difficult to have a series of nodes along the information processing matrix to track "confidence levels". Though, I suppose that's kind of what is happening when the creators of these projects try to keep their projects from processing controversial topics. It's my understanding those instances act as something of a short circuit where (if you will) when confidence "that I'm allowed to walk about this" drops below a certain level, the AI will spit out a canned response vs actually attempting to process input against the model.

The above is intended ad more a brain dump than a coherent argument. You've given me something to chew on, and for that I thank you!

You mean Nansssy Peloslither the Reptoid?

I have to say no, I can't.

The best decision I could make is a guess based on the logic I've determined from my own experiences that I would then compare and contrast to the current input.

I will say that "current input" for humans seems to be more broad than what is achievable for AI and the underlying mechanism that lets us assemble our training set (read as: past experiences) into useful and usable models appears to be more robust than current tech, but to the best of my ability to explain it, this appears to be a comparable operation to what is happening with the current iterations of LLM/AI.

Ninjaedit: spelling

I suppose everyone is entitled to an opinion, no matter how wrong it is.

Point of further support: Hawaiians have a weird (to us haoles) love of Las Vegas, going as far as to call it "the Ninth Island". I mean, if you live on a tropical paradise, where are you supposed to go for vacation?

And Elvis is (or at least has a rep as being) super popular and iconic in Vegas. I could definitely see some of that influence back flowing from the Ninth Island back to Hawaii.

For the record comp sci major here.

So I understand all that but my counter point: can we prove by empirical measure that humans operate in a way that is significantly different? (If there is, I would love to know because I was cornered by a similar talking point when making a similar argument some weeks ago)

There is literally no opinion to OP's opinion

Even with my down vote, your vote count is still positive, which disproves your point (I think?)

I mean, our side is totally good with peace.

But by God(s), have you seen what The Other Guys(tm) are like? How could peace loving, respectable, and respectful abide while such villains attack/persecute/ridicule us?

It's not our fault; they made us do it.

/s

Eh, better to celebrate those who could keep up than to fret over those who couldn't.

Let's not lose sight of the important part:

That they're plotting it together

Fuck, you guys made it to part 2?

No, Freezing to death while drinking porridge together

Whoa, does that mean if Trump gets elected again that Inside Job will get a 3rd season?!? Wow, I know who I'm voting for this election!!1! :D /s

This thread really has brought out some real crazies.

But you sir are, in fact, a demon among men.

And they look to have the same/comparable ride height/total height

And 20 more reading yours.

In a lot of ways, this is where I'd like to be, but my mind hesitation to jump from Spotify (and comparable services) is the ability to discover new music across a crazy variety of genres. Especially since it's stable and uses the same controls every time, I think I'd have a hard time leaving.

Big tech got me addicted like that.

What do you do for music instead?