DaBabyAteMaDingo @ DaBabyAteMaDingo @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

164

Joined

2 yr. ago

I'm demonstrably right though 😂

Then by that logic it's fair game for native Americans to start cleansing all European bloodlines in the United States? As a Latino person, I can go into any southwest state and start killing my neighbors because their ancestors "caused harm, anger, and hatred by using terrorism (fear and violence) to enforce their rule over people"?

How are you tankies this fucking dumb?

Palestine is protecting and aiding Hamas, though.

Uhh yeah? This is the bloodiest attack Palestine has ever done against Israel. Are you stunned? 😂

You recall that Hamas attacked Israel in the bloodiest assault in history, right?

You guys make me embarrassed to call myself a lefty.

A-fucking-men, brother!

Name the album

It's the most important part! Remember, when you're filling out your dating profile, keep the salary figure within reason or they'll know you're being yourself a little too hard.

I always find that "a little over six figures" is just vague enough to get you out of a jamb should they find out about your disgusting financial situation! Almost like saying you're six feet tall: who's gonna prove you're really 5'-9" unless they measure you!

I'm so sorry to hear that 😢

Can you donate half of it for people in need? I'll gladly take on that burden for you, my friend 🧔‍♀️

American here, what does it mean to recognize a class of indigenous people in Australia?

Because we have a very different understanding of the word lol

How bout I pejorative my mouth to your ass?

He wasn't arguing, though lol. It was his opinion.

I replied to someone who had no interest in critically engaging and offered two weak and irrelevant options in efforts to downplay another commenters stance on a meme. A literal bad argument vs an opinion to a meme. Try again, you corny head ass 😂

Is this how lemmy debates online?

I'm about this close to going back on reddit. They're idiots and commies over there but usually not both lol

Don't listen to this guy, OP. Divorce, keep the pets, key her car and start watching battle bots.

Thank me later... >!freaking /s obviously!<

This is the way. Assuming the hydraulic fluid isn't shot, slowing the close and latch should do the trick.

Also, that big ass nut on the side controls the force of the door I believe.

100% agree. I've always said the cringiest thing about me is my love of guns. It truly is fashion accessories for men like purses lol

Proud gun owner here. I'd like to see a more proactive approach to gun registration and some sort of yearly inspections for "assault rifles" - just to appease the ones that don't know anything about guns. Kinda like how you would get "tags" on a car, if that makes sense.

However, we should be able to own fully automatic firearms and silencers/suppressors, muzzle breaks and other "evil" attachments and modifications if the previously mentioned system is in place. The more capable and dangerous the machine, the more tests and certifications you'll need to legally own them. AND we should have special firing ranges for these types of guns. Obviously this is not a realistic goal I'm *in this current system but I just want a MP5 :'(

What would you say to something like this?

But it highlights the reality - while AI generated content may be considered fairly obvious for now, it won't be forever. Real CSAM could be mixed in at some point, or, hell, the characters generating it could be feeding it real CSAM to have it recreate it in a manner that makes it harder to detect.

Very true and I would like to look into it further. Being able to disguise real content with an AI label could make things harder for people that detect and report these types of issues.

So what does this mean for hosting providers? We continuously receive reports for a client and each time we have to review it and what, use our best judgement to decide if it's AI generated? We add the client to a list and ignore CSAM reports for them? We have to tell the government that it's not "real CSAM" and expect it to end there?

I don't understand the logic behind this. If it's your job to analyze and deduce whether certain content is or is not acceptable, why shouldn't you make assessments on a case by case basis? Even if you remove CSAM from the equation you still have to continuously sift through content and report any and all illegal activities - regardless of its frequency.

No legitimate hosting provider is going to knowingly host CSAM, AI generated or not. We aren't going to invest legal resources into defending that, nor are we going to jeopardize the mental well-being of our staff by increasing the frequency of those reports.

And it's the right of any website or hosting provider to not show any content they deem unsuitable for it's viewers. But this is a non sequitur - illegal activities will never stop and it's the duty of people like you to help and combat the distribution of such materials. I appreciate all the work people like you do and it's a job I couldn't handle. CP exists and will continue to exist. It's just an ugly truth. I'm just asking a very uncomfortable question that will hopefully result in a very positive answer: can AI generated CP reduce the harm done to children?

Here's a very interesting article of the potential positive effects of AI generated CP

Btw I appreciate your input in all of this. It means a lot coming from someone actually involved with this sort of thing.

Edit: and to your point, the article ends with a very real warning:

"Of course, using AI-generated images as a form of rehabilitation, alongside existing forms of therapy and treatment, is not the same as allowing its unbridled proliferation on the web.

“There’s a world of difference between the potential use of this content in controlled psychiatric settings versus what we’re describing here, which is just, anybody can access these tools to create anything that they want in any setting,” said Portnoff, from Thorn."