I'm just having a discussion with you about it. It sounds like there wasn't disinfo so much as a difference of opinion, and you don't like that people disagreed with you, so now you're resorting to ableist language. Cool. Thanks for putting it on display like I was hoping you wouldn't but knew you would.
Why don't you pop in and discuss it with us? I don't remember seeing your username in any of the news mega threads. Should be easy to debunk obvious misinformation and we'd appreciate the discussion.
For sure, no worries. I had the same questions as you when reading it. Fwiw, the paper is really kind of sloppy. I think it's maybe a case of poor students not wanting to pay for GPT-4? Maybe they'll clean it up and respond to some of the criticisms when it comes out of draft, but it doesn't seem like very rigorous scholarship to me.
![DPRK_Chopra [comrade/them]](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/63514665-7e23-4f5a-a6c2-7b06b40ecc77.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
I'm just having a discussion with you about it. It sounds like there wasn't disinfo so much as a difference of opinion, and you don't like that people disagreed with you, so now you're resorting to ableist language. Cool. Thanks for putting it on display like I was hoping you wouldn't but knew you would.