Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CR
Posts
1
Comments
145
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Oh I know. It is your call. I've not seen much evidence of tutanova/proton Lemmy adverts. This service is quite new in comparison and there is clearly some astroturfing on lemmy. We don't know how good or bad they are tbh. The fact they are pushing it rather than relying on word of mouth is a little sketchy.

    Whether it is deleted or not, I'll at least call out advertising so people are aware rather than being led to believe it is recommended.

  • We don't know what it is, but there is history on Lemmy of them listing out every feature, asking I'd anyone used it as they didn't. Why woupd anyone do that? More blatant in the past, but worth being on guard against them.

    Plus advertising e2e encrypted emaill which is impossible unless recipient is same service.

  • Nothing has exactly the same experience as MS. I don't think there is a clone project for it.

    The two you listed are your best options.

    Does LibreOffice have any issues that prevent you using it? If not, it's probably that your expectations are set by your comfort and familiarity with Office and that is the problem you need to solve.

  • Firstly, I have more than one account for different purposes. These were created when performance problems were rampant, and my view was always to return, and then the Hexbear defederation happened before even federation occurred based on speculation. It was much quicker than Exploding Heads defederation was. Based on that decision and the way it was worded in the announcement, which failed to be impartial, detached, or hiding in personal intent, I was hesitant to return fully. See the lemm.ee announcement taken for contrast which was done by someone with more than enough reason to defederate, but they approached it in a balanced and mature manner. In line with that, this can become quite sinister:

    "Always post compliant content that upholds the rules of the individual community and the website, and is of personal interest to you."

    "uphold the rules of the website" and ensure posts are "compliant". It very much comes across as though world is a political site, and has taken a clear editorial line. Anyone from the left isn't welcome... and steps will be taken if it makes anyone feel any cognitive dissonance. lemmy.ml, lemm.ee and shit.just.works are far superior general purpose instances.

    Interestingly enough, you have the following:

    "Vote for the content, not for the person."

    and yet you decided to search me, and go for the ad hominem. Playing the person and not the point. I'm getting the anyone that disagrees is a problem vibe here.

  • Lemmy.world getting increasingly like Beehaw on steroids. Ironically, for their anti-authoritarian editorial policies, they're increasingly stomping down what is and isn't acceptable. Most people who like to be treated like adults fortunately have lemm.ee or Lemmy.ml

    Signed, former Lemmy.world resident

  • Like the time when a kid in school tried to create their own nickname and everyone noped the fuck out and carried on calling them the same thing they were.

    You don't get to pick your nickname, even if you started trying 20 years ago, FF.

  • Lemm.ee think before defed. Lemmy.ml is run by the lemmy devs who are communists and don't have the sane desire to silence any non-American view.

    I used to be on world, but it's become quite politicised and intolerant of any view other than their admins.

  • Delayed response, but based on you liking Minecraft, survival type genre might be good.

    Valheim and Project Zomboid are great games. Subnautica is very immersive. Stardew Valley is a lot of fun.

    BTW, have you tried MineClone2 on Minetest. It's a Minecraft clone so much more fun than Minetest.

  • Your logic was insane and misplaced. We weren't talking about descendants. It was a weird logical reach.

    This whole debate is about an 11 year old girl and 2 men that got mauled after she ran past a dog and got attacked. This debate is about safety and whether these dogs should be allowed as pets. You may want to shift the debate and move the goalposts, but no way is it justifiable.

    If the people defending the breed of dogs aren't going to bother coming up with solutions, their views won't be taken seriously. A young girl got attacked here. A 10 year old got killed 2 years ago. A middle aged lady a few months ago in the UK. Dog attacks in Britain have quadrupled and this breed of dog is the largest perpetrator. If you are advocating maintaining the status quo, you are advocating for more deaths.

    I agree they should be jailed and dog owners of many breeds should be licensed.

  • That is very tangential. You could just admit you were wrong and that it wasn't a British creation, name wise. Seems your ego is a little too frail for that. Sorry to see that.