Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CR
Posts
25
Comments
5,114
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's just creepy because in every other obvious scam like this for the last 10 years they use the same single picture of the same person on everyone. Now suddenly there are dozens of different pictures, all clearly of the same woman, going to different people.

  • Speaking of new to the internet, it's clearly not a harassment campaign against her. This is waaaay too much effort. There's only 3 things that would engender this level of effort. Money, government spying, or mental illness.

  • Sure, depending on the issue. But the main issue is that some people actually DO need those, and for those people, it's absolutely a reading comprehension thing (which could have roots in being overworked, not caring, low attention span, poor schooling, any number of things, but the end result is poor reading comprehension).

  • Who said anything about not proofreading? My emails are perfectly legible and written in proper English. You're equating "lack of dumbed-down easy to digest bullet points" with "sloppy, error-filled writing". They're two extremely different things.

  • Sure it is. A lot of people would agree that viewing drawings or AI generated CP is a victimless crime.

    Or for another example, two under-18s taking nude pics and sending them to each other. Technically illegal, but morally? Probably not bad.

  • But just to speak to what you said, if they are non-offending, are you talking about the ones that dont physically assault children? Because the ones who are viewing and distributing csam are still harming children. Maybe not directly, but its like supply and demand, isn’t it? People make it if people want it.

    I intentionally left that vague because of the nuance you mentioned. I think most people agree that physical assault of a child is heinous. Consumption of CP is more of a difficult gray area.

  • People don't choose to be pedophiles. We shouldn't hate them just for existing.

    People choose to abuse children, and that should be strongly punished and I think the majority agrees with me on that.

    But a non-offending pedophile is someone with a disability and should be treated as such.

  • My proposal is that Democrats start lying.

    Go on Tiktok, claim you're gonna pass a law capping rent at $500/mo.

    Go on MSNBC and say "clearly we can't do that, it will cause severe economic shock, but we'll look at expanding rent control and increasing housing stock"

    There's no consequences anymore. Just tell people what they want to hear. Say crazy populist shit. Have your donors purchase media outlets and juice the algorithm. Have botnets spread misinfo and disinfo. Then when you're in power enact reasonable policy.

    Voters don't like boring, reasonable policy. That's not enough drama. Start saying wild shit.