Croquette @ Croquette @sh.itjust.works

Posts

8

Comments

1,154

Joined

2 yr. ago

People spend thousands of dollar for their furniture, but dont want to pay the extra 75$ it takes to have strong people come and bring their furniture home.

Yes, but it is not acceptable in today's capitalism. Only the growth of growth matters.

If the line does not go up enough, the company is failing.

There is no point of starting the chart to 0 since it doesn't give any information other than the share price, which is already communicated by the Y axis anyways.

Might be that the CEO and upper management are dumb fucks running the company to the ground.

No more innovation, just microtransactions in shitty games, and the same old rehashed concepts.

I understand the need to privacy as people get older, but if my kids want to stay with me for a long period of their life, I will be pleased to have them with me as long as they like.

Are you okay? OP's post was pretty well written, and the guy only explained his moral dilemma without being disrespectful and you come shouting down like a banshee.

His point is a totally valid one and should be discussed to alleviate any moral dilemma to be had.

My neckbeard grew instantly reading that post.

I would be curious how costly is the overhead + social charges, but I am pretty sure that nurses would make more than at their private agency.

Like even if we split that in half to be really conservative, that would be a bit more than 65$/h.

Also, I am pretty sure that no nurse got. 33% raise. So some fat fingers got into the cookie jar.

The economy seems to be extremely slow and everyone that looks for a job, regardless of the field, have problems.

This is anecdotal, but I usually get the typical recruiter in my inbox twice or month at least, but lately, I don't have any. It usually means less hiring.

Eugenics doesn't mean killing anyone, just improve the genetic qualities of humans.

You could do selective breeding, incentivized breeding (entice the right candidates with whatever) ,gene manipulations, etc..

But I understand that proponents of eugenics usually have extreme right wing views, and why you would come to that conclusion.

I'd be fucking butthurt as well if my pet project was being destroyed by mega corpos for a shitty generative thief AI.

At one point, if you explicitly put your body on social media, multiple time, on multiple platforms, that's kind of the expected behaviour no?

Sometimes, i wanna watch porn and sometimes I want to look at women that I find attractive. Does that mean that I have to exclusively watch someone my age?

I much prefer looking at women my age, but let's be real, the older I get, the less I see them on social media.

Did that work?

Because the dumdums have access to the whole world at the tip of the fingertip without having to put any efforts in.

In a time without that, they would be ridiculed for their stupid ideas and told to pipe down.

Now they can find like minded people and amplify their stupidity, and be loud about it.

So every dumdum becomes an AI prompt engineer (whatever the fuck that means) and know how to game the LLM, but do not understand how it works. So they are basically just snake oil salesmen that want to get on the gravy train.

What do you think I linked dipshit?

With ridiculous patent like that, Nintendo could sue pretty much any companies.

ChatGPT is scraping copyrighted material, not patents.

Nintendo is suing for patent infringement.

How much is Nintendo paying you to be their mouth piece?

Have you seen the kind of patents Nintendo are trying to get?

Here is an example :

Publication number: 20240286040 Abstract: In an example of a game program, a ground boarding target object or an air boarding target object is selected by a selection operation, and a player character is caused to board the selected boarding target object. If the player character aboard the air boarding target object moves toward the ground, the player character is automatically changed to the state where the player character is aboard the ground boarding target object, and brought into the state where the player character can move on the ground.

You can check them out for yourself

patents assigned to the pokemon company

So calm the fuck down with your chatGPT which is a whole different situation.

The comparison is valid, but doesn't mean it infringes on any patent.

Otherwise, FromSoftware would sue the shit out of every soulslike out there.

No I've never worked a government job. But you are right, they like to abbreviate everything haha.

If they can intercept the message where it isn't encrypted, they can simply sniff the messages coming on the page and wait for their signal.

Then, they can trigger the explosive to a specific message.

That's a wild guess though.