Skip Navigation

Posts
78
Comments
335
Joined
6 yr. ago

  • there are more communists in the state of Kerala, India, than there are anarchists in the world. Your whiteness shows.

    even those more radical than you

    Who is more radical than MLs? You, who spend your time trolling online? 😂

  • Yo as per our survey, more than 60% of our users don't identify as white, cis het males. Additionally we have users from literally over the world. Waiting to see Beehaw's survey.

  • What does this have to do with anything?

  • I agree we should wage unlimited warfare on all fascists, and I support Ukrainian fascists killing Russian fascists, let them take care of each other. Your point?

  • I think the first question you should ask yourself is why do you think Putin spreads propaganda, but the western media spreads the truth and facts?

  • I don't know, the gene pool comment is weird. Do they think Chernobyl is going to give them superpowers, or are they Banderites?

  • Totally agree bro we must secure the existence of our people amirite?

  • Yeah whatever, it's still a banderite slogan lmao

  • I think you mistakenly copied a part of the telegram twice, this is what I can read from the picture:

    "I express my hearty thanks to your party for the revolutionary greetings sent to me on the New Year. Last year, your party and the progressive Black people of America courageously repulsed the ever-intensified fascist oppression and persecution by the U.S. imperialists and won great victory in the struggle for freedom, democracy, and vital rights.

    The Korean people watch with profound sympathy and express militant solidarity with your just struggle to abolish the cursed system of racial discrimination of the U.S. imperialists and win liberty and emancipation.

    Convinced that the militant ties between the Korean people and the progressive Black people of America will further strengthen and develop in the new year in the battle against U.S. imperialism, our common enemy, I wish you fresh successes in your struggle."

  • There was a CIA-funded coup in Ukraine in 2014 (Euromaidan https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/2014_Ukrainian_coup_d%27etat), after which a Banderite president, Porochenko, got into power.

    Bandera was a Ukrainian fascist who gleefully collaborated with the Nazis during WW2 (https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Organization_of_Ukrainian_Nationalists).

    Because of their shared past inside the USSR, Ukraine and Russia's borders and history got mingled, and Krushchev gave Ukraine the region of Crimea in 1954. The people in the Donbass region, to this day, are ethnically Russians but with a Ukrainian nationality.

    Things worked out fine until the Banderites started making a comeback. When Porochenko assumed the "presidency" of this fine "democracy", he start promoting Ukrainian nationalism and indeed exceptionalism. Russian was no longer considered an official language and the people in the Donbass slowly were becoming second class citizens.

    Moreover, a worrying turn of events was that Ukraine, since 2014, was rapidly rehabilitating their Nazi past with pride. New Bandera statues were being put up. This map gives an interesting outlook on the divide Ukraine was facing as an "independent" state:

    2014 is also around the time the Azov Battalion was formed (https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion), named after either the town of Azov, in the Donetsk Oblast -- the same one that seceded from Ukraine -- or the neighbouring sea. Their goal was to terrorise the people living in the Donbass with full government support. I think it's not hyperbole to say they were trying to ethnically cleanse their ethnic Russian minority who, let's remember, were Ukrainian citizens.

    This eventually led to a civil war that has been raging since 2014 and is still going on, except Russia is now involved directly.

    The first kickoff that got Russia involved was the attacks on Crimea, which like I said belonged to Russia before Krushchev the revisionist gave it to Ukraine. So Russia moved their troops in (I'm iffy on the details of when and why exactly), a referendum was eventually held, and Crimea decided to join the RF.

    Russia under Putin of course considers the people of the Donbass and Crimea as Russians, and I personally think there is merit to the claim that Putin wants to repatriate Russian regions into the RF. As for the Donbass, the "People's republic" (mostly in name, they weren't really socialist) proclaimed themselves in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, which Russia recognized. Thus the RF became involved in this civil war originally as more of a passive supporter, promoting a dialogue and then, when the agreements were achieved, soldiers from the RF were sent to the Donbass to set up checkpoints and prevent more incursions into the oblast, notably from Azov.

    This dialogue led to the Minsk I and Minsk II agreements. It first led to Minsk I which essentially said stop shelling the Donbass and let them live in peace as Ukrainian-Russians (and when I say shelling, I mean it: they were using mortars and other military weapons on civilians in the Donbass). Ukraine signed the agreement and then promptly went back to shelling their own citizens.

    So Minsk II was signed and again Ukraine ignored it and continued terrorizing their people.

    Eventually, Zelensky was elected in 2019 and... nobody in Ukraine seemed to care. There's a video, if I can find it, floating around the Internet of Zelensky meeting with his troops at the frontline in 2019 or 2020 and telling them to stop attacking the Donbass and the soldier he's talking to just doesn't give a shit. This guy has no authority whatsoever, just because there was an election after the coup doesn't make Zelensky an actual authority figure.

    From what I understand Zelensky takes his orders from the Banderites running the country currently, and the Banderites take their orders from NATO.

    So the shelling continued, the people in the Donbass were still fighting, Russia was at a stalemate but was clear in not getting involved directly for the Donbass. Meanwhile in the western media the Banderite legacy and revival of Ukraine was completely ignored as they focused on running yellow journalism "trust me bro Putin is totally going to invade Ukraine tomorrow trust me" articles year after year between 2014-2022.

    Except suddenly in 2021 Ukraine started talking about joining NATO. And Russia is not stupid: if randos like us on the Internet can see the writing on the wall, Russia can see it too. NATO gave their promise to Gorbachev, the traitor to socialism, that they would not expand eastward. That was in the 90s. Since then, they did expand towards Russia.

    And that was pretty much the red line for Russia who was slowly being surrounded by NATO (https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_Treaty_Organization). Let's remember that while NATO claims to be a "defensive alliance", they invaded Iraq (during the Kuwait war) and Afghanistan, two countries who did not attack a member state. Russia had also been fighting against NATO for example in Syria, and IIRC also deployed troops to some South American countries (including Venezuela) to prevent US regime change.

    Does Putin want Russia to be imperialist? Probably. I mean, once capitalism is sufficiently developed in Russia, they'll have to. Putin at least has shown he has no plans to become a comprador (despite being courted as such before he was elected). But they're not there yet. At this time, I really don't see the arguments that say Russia is imperialist. Their GPD is about the same as that of the Low Countries combined and capitalism is not sufficiently developed in post-Soviet Russia to start exporting capital and forcibly opening new markets for themselves. They're barely back to their pre-illegal dissolution outputs.

    With that said we can't ignore the Donbass is a very resource-rich region. Historically, Donbass was the producer of steel for the Soviet Union (if you've heard of the "Azovstal" battle in Mariupol, it literally means Azov steel, Azov being the neighbouring sea).

    And now, it's come out that NATO had 0 intention of letting Ukraine join and announced membership just to provoke Russia, Zelensky is doing more unhinged shit by the day (here's the war crimes he committed just in the early months of the war: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/137899), and Merkel recently admitted Minsk I and II were only negotiated to gain some time for NATO to train Ukraine.

    With this context in mind, I don't see how we can analyse this war any differently than Russia defending itself against NATO. I echo was some communist parties have said, that it's regrettable these once fraternal people united under a socialist government are now at war against each other. We can blame NATO for that, but I also can't ignore the Banderite revival in Ukraine that was their own doing, and I'm not going to cry for dead Nazis.

    As for annexation, there is no certainty this is going to happen. When the war began, Russia announced their goals clearly: liberate the Donbass region, safeguard Crimea (Ukraine cut off the water supply, using the dams on the Dniepr -- one of which was blown up last night), and basically push NATO back, i.e. make Ukraine sign a treaty that they will not join NATO. But the war has evolved so much from the early days, like the Ukrainian Army now is mostly NATO soldiers and the US keeps telling Zelensky not to sign a peace treaty (and like a good little dog, he obeys). This thing could have been over in the first 3 months if Ukraine had been willing to negotiate, but they don't. At every turn they find new ways to fuck up, and at this point what can Russia do but keep pushing forward until Ukraine has no choice but to accept peace? Anything can happen at this point as to the fate of Ukraine.

  • That's the purpose of this instance, we're all CIA agents.

    Say hi to Eric in accounting for me when you hand in your PTO request btw Johnson.

  • Lemmygrad is paid for by muad'dibber, the VPS isn't terribly expensive

  • It's funny cause state sponsored homophobia was by and large exported by the west

  • They need to find hobbies, who has the energy to be collecting these screenshot?

  • It might be this woman:

    Supposedly executed for murder in the 90s. If anyone can confirm the sign around her neck?

  • It's another rail on the track towards fascism. I'm preparing a thread for Twitter about it haha

  • I dislike ChatGPT's attitude tbh. Which asks very interesting questions about AI and our relation to it. But regardless, I don't like the "know-it-all" attitude and reluctance to agree with and help you, especially when half the info it gives is false and you have to double-check it yourself.

    But I did manage to make ChatGPT agree that the 1931-33 famine in the USSR was mostly the result of natural causes and not deliberately manufactured.

  • No it makes sense. 4channers are contrarians at heart. Their white supremacism comes from a different place than liberals.

    Both MLK and Malcolm X talked about the white liberals and how at least with the openly racist conservatives/fascists, they knew they were an enemy, but the white liberal would look like your friend until he stabbed you in the back.

    At heart we have a fundamental difference in that 4channers are contrarians and liberals (which include trumpists) are followers.

    The 4channer would totally say the same things and even worse if the government supported Russia over Ukraine. Let's not forget they committed their share of shootings too.

    Edit: and that's my problem also with these "the worst person you know just made a great point" or "broken clock is right twice a day". Every time you say that, you cede ground to fascists, comrades. Every time you see that happening is an instance where we could have been there saying the same thing from our POV, but we didn't.

    Fascists are never truthful, they only ever twist words to get what they need out of them. If we let them be the face of the anti-war movement, then that's what they will become. And anti-war people will rally to them.