Yes, it's me who's dooming Palestine, some guy in New Jersey, not the feral apartheid state that's decimating Gaza or any of the countries providing weapons and financing for them to do so.
I don't know what you are talking about. I'm not running in the election. I only have one mathematically insignificant vote to cast. Meanwhile, the Kamala campaign can actually affect the outcome of the election by taking positions that attract or repel millions of votes.
You might recall that those were primary elections and AIPAC ran ads attacking Bush and Bowman for anything and everything. Unless they think Kamala is actually "stronger" on Israel, they're just going to support Trump in the general election anyway. Maybe her campaign thinks AIPAC can be appeased, but it still comes down to the apparent decision that they don't need anti-genocide votes. Shrimp and grits!
Hydrogen production can make fossil fuel peaking plants obsolete if there's enough capacity to soak up excess nuclear and reweable power during periods of low demand. Long term storage is a possibility, but we need hydrogen anyway for GHG-free ammonia (fertilizer), steel production, and vehicle fuel.
What I mean is that I consider basketball, for example, to be a winter sport since it is properly played indoors on a wooden court and therefore its season is during the cold months of the year.
I know it's okay to throw away traditional alkaline battery cells in the trash or the ocean or whatever, but I always thought that doing so was improper, so I've just been collecting a bag of them thinking that I'll eventually figure out how to dispose of them properly. The article implies that it's proper to just throw them in the trash. Is that true?
If Kamala really needs the anti-genocide vote, she should convince old Joe to start sanctioning Israel now.