Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CR
Posts
1
Comments
331
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • There's this saying "this isn't an airport, no need to announce your departure". So unless there's an actual need for people to know where I am going and/or why, there's no point in telling them.

    If the people in the room are your close friends, that's a different question though.

  • Like Randelung said, that would be true if you couldn't reset you password via email. But as long as that's possible the email can't ever be the 2nd factor because it can be used to (re)set the 1st one.

    A safer definition of what the 2 factors should be is "something you know" and "something you own". The "know" is usually a password (which you can remember, but you should use a password manager these days so you can have a different password for every service). The "own" is typically a phone these days (generating a timed code, for example). But it doesn't have to be, it can be a physically USB dongle or your fingerprint. The idea is that it's something that can't be overheard, or recorded via key logger or or even told to someone.

    Steam does this better (as in safer) than most.

  • That's the point of real 2fa. And the process of activating it also makes it very clear. I find it incredibly frustrating when I activate 2fa on some service, and they allow email as a fallback that I can't turn off. Cause that turns it back into single factor, being the email. That's what the recovery codes are for.

    Otherwise, if someone has access to your email, they can just reset the password and get access (cause that is the 2nd factor). Then they can change the associated email address and that's that.

  • The politicians in charge of making the laws often lack the understanding needed to make privacy respecting laws. So it's possible, it's just not happening. They also listen to actual experts ready to little, but do listen to lobbyists.

    This also doesn't address the censorship side of the problems.

    Just for a random example, literally the first thing I thought of: let's say there's a youth movement to affect climate change, or some other issue. They organize general protests, boycotts on "bad companies" and are starting to get somewhere (politically and affecting the bottom lines of these companies). This is coordinated using some online communication platform, think Reddit, lemmy or whatever (Facebook, whatever). Those that want it to "go away" can just include that in the list of sites that fall under thes "youth protection" laws.

    Then there's laws like that being extended it abused to do things that weren't originally intended, which is also hard to safeguard against. Future legislation might extend the age range from 16 to 18, then to 21. With the list of blocked sites also growing conveniently alongside, and boom you got a nice censorship platform. Not saying that will happen, but making sure it can't is what's hard.

  • This sounds good on paper until you realize that what is considered "social media" is up to whoever happens to hold that position. Even ignoring the fact that it's unenforceable anyway, unless you require a real ID, wish is just straight up worse for all sorts of reasons.

    The idea is nice, but actually putting it into law without opening the door to censorship and other side effects is just not plausible.

    Edit: also, Everytime you read about a poll like this, ask yourself: what was the question they asked? Did it provide any context? Did it require any understanding of the actual underlying issues and laws? Or was it some variation of "think of the children"?

  • If money is generally more on the tighter side, I honestly can't understand getting a Mac anything. It's many things, but never "frugal". There are always options that do more for less, and maybe look a little less polished.

  • If you got that kind of money to spend on a laptop, sure. I really don't.

    Edit: to be clear, I know this is a stack of Mac's in OPs picture, but the development that the entry models have basically no ports at all is a more recent development. Having to pick the pro just to be able to connect your stuff without dongles or hubs is a bit insane considering the price (and price difference).

  • A wildly overpowered PSU will also use more power at low loads, as that's outside the efficiency range. The ratings (like gold or platinum) also usually don't apply, as loads like that are not part of the certification process.

    This may be irrelevant to you of course, depending on your electricity prices.

  • Many that were filmed in front of a live audience still had a laugh track. Either to correct them not laughing or not laughing enough at the clearly excellently written jokes, or laughing at things they weren't supposed to was removed or dampened.