Yea, all my pictures look a bit fuzzy due to being on my phone, a dedicated camera sounds great. I'm tight on cash now, though, so that'll take a while.
That would have helped, sure, but it would have had to be genuine. The real reason Harris lost is because she ran a right-wing campaign when the working class has been increasingly radicalized.
I've been dabbling a bit, but I never thought to go out and intentionally do it, it's always been incidental on my walks around where I live. I should try and expand it!
What does "left" mean to you? What did it originally mean when it first became a phrase, and how does that apply to modern times? Again, I may be a Marxist, but this is a dominant viewpoint outside of highly western, liberal publications, and it isn't just Marxists that have this understanding of right and left. Trying to equate my logic to anti-vaxx movements is just a baseless jab that avoids answering the arguments I made.
I always recommend Blowback, and I've recently been getting into Rev Left Radio. The former is an excellent anti-imperialist podcast going over the crimes of the US Empire, the latter is a solid podcast discussing Marxist-Leninist history, theory, and practice.
These are all good points, but I do think it's important for those with the capacity to join an org and get organized. Capitalism is the problem, and we cannot just wait for it to fall. It gets easier to topple over time, but if we never kill it, it will stay on life support.
The reason it's a false dichotomy is because the implicit point of the OP is that revolution is necessary. The original commenter either didn't pick that up or ignored it, centering voting as the primary means of political engagement without addressing the point raised by the OP.
No, it is not entirely possible. The system is designed to aopear that way, but in reality those in power will use everything they can to prevent workers from taking from them.
You're extremely confused, I'm not blaming "low information voters" of any sort. Electoralism is not a valid path for leftism. I'm not using a money excuse, either, though your erasure of money's influence on media is also oversimplified. You haven't taken any steps back, you've invented a caricature of "the left" in your head and are acting like you're the only one to see things as they really are. It's very silly.
There have never been left presidents in the US. Mamdani is not the leader of the revolution. You're very confused about what's going on, and you're out of touch with why Trump won. It wasn't "memes," it isn't some masterful play, nor are liberals left wing.
You need to take a step back and familiarize yourself more with what's going on. Try to take a materialist outlook, not an idealist outlook.
No, lol. The Left is fine on the internet. You can touch grass and organize, and do online agitprop. Mamdani won because people are being radicalized. Even then, Mamdani doesn't eliminate the need for revolution, not even close.
Oh, that's a tough one! Socialism: Utopian and Scientific is definitely a top contender, but Lenin is clearer. Maybe Foundations of Leninism? Either way, I 100% agree, State and Revolution is a must read.
She could have run an entirely different campaign, one appealing to workers, but she didn't. Trump also said he supported Israel. Your point is veering on "muslims are too stupid to realize Trump is a Zionist too," which is horrible. Reconsider the options and see how Mamdani is doing very well, the US wants candidates to the left of the DNC, and the DNC won't do it because they'd rather lose.
![Cowbee [he/they]](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/c18ce632-5fb5-4888-8226-3dc55a07acc4.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
Yea, all my pictures look a bit fuzzy due to being on my phone, a dedicated camera sounds great. I'm tight on cash now, though, so that'll take a while.