Cosmicomical @ Cosmicomical @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

562

Joined

2 yr. ago

Fascinating

No, I understand we have questions but explaining epstein requires a couple of details, while UFOs require new laws of physics.

Sure we can't prove it but that diagram puts it at the same level of UFOs.

If I fuck myself they'll think I'm half transgender and take away my rights

You probably wanted to be ironic, but the irony in this case is misplaced :D

Sure, buying power increased since 2019 and my uncle owns Nintendo

Lol apparently judges are selected for low iq as well

This has nothing to do with the will of the people

Well played, two steps backwards and one step forward. As usual.

Lol inflation up 30%

Polls would be ok if the sample was peefectly random. However it is never fully random, and in practice they always overrepresent politically active people and underrepresent the poor.

Then we need to find another word to express when people gets together to do shady shit, which happens more often than not.

What are you talking about? Polls are not valid statistics, they are riddled with biases that can't be eliminated.

I would 100% vote for you (unironically).

"Literally" CAN be used as an hyperbole. It's just a more emphatic way to say "very"

I think the confusion arises from the secrecy part. A conspiracy is understood to be a secret unlawful activity, especially of subversive nature. When it's not secret anymore is it still conspiracy? or is it just organised crime? I know it feels just pedantic, but this is why the media abuses words to steer collective opinion. Nowadays you can just say something is a conspiracy and people will believe it's fake without recourse.

That's the most annoying misunderstanding. A conspiracy is still a conspiracy when you prove it happened/it's happening. Conspirators remain conspirators, which means they were working together to do something illegal in secret. Ok, so now it's not secret anymore, but they still conspired.

Epstein didn't kill himself though. The circumstances where above the level of questioning, there were cameras turned off and he was supposedly on suicide watch.

Yeah it could emerge apparently at random for unsuspecting familiars, but this guy was about to do something that was important for him, on which he worked for years according to the article. Sounds sus to me.

So, the guy was expected to appear in court for thw second round of questioning and when he didn't show up was found dead in his truck in the underground car park of the hotel. Doesn't sound like someone that wanted to end it. Maybe I'm wrong but I wouldn't book a room to go to court and then on a whim decide to end it.

They should investigate the coroner asap.