Red Army Dog Cooper @ CooperRedArmyDog @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

296

Joined

3 yr. ago

Look man, I am not religious, but religion is not the reason bad people do bad things, I am not going to say it is nessicarily an inharent part of their charicter, but there are other reasons. People will also do great feets of good in the name of religion as well. to boil it all down to religion is really an over simplification.

non-jews and non-whites... they have also turned away black jewish people trying to enter and claim the "right to return" because well the racism thing

I mean, unless we assume that the United States is a terrorist organisation, then it would make sense why they would support the likes of the IOF.... Eh Eh?

this is pattently false, and this statement right here is why the PRC is able to run circles around the west, while also publishing 5 year plans on exactly what they are going to do and how they are going to do it. The west just pretends they are lieing

I am sorry for you.

Because the principle struggle is the class struggle between the working class and the owning classes, all other strugles are either secondary, incidental, or made up in order to distract us from the principle strugle, or a combination of the above. Once one learns this, the world starts to lock into a better prospective and we can start working to our ultimate goal, making a stew from the Rich

The US does not follow their own bill of rights worth shit, and do you mind showing me where the PRC violates their own constitution please?

Taking the wealthy is not socialism, it is at best, a very mild form of social democracy. The ballance of power is not changed the owning class still has all the power as they still own the means of production.

I understand Jeasus was a passifist, and he would not have lead a violent revolution, but he would have advocated the workers runing the show, not just "taxing the rich"

With that Established I posit, that the Quality of life is SIgnificantly better, in the Peoples Republic of China

There is no evidence of the "genicide in Xinjiang" besided the US, US allies and other sources stemming from Radio Free Asia, a known CIA mouth peice. when an idependent investigation came out by the orginasation of Islamic and Turkic States, investigated, they found no evidence of genocide.

Ok? I usualy get the "pleasure" of arguing with americans ... usualy in real life" so are we going with constitutions are words on paper or infaliable documents?

Jeasus was not "in favor of taxing the wealthy" he was a full on socialist, if they had the term at the time. He through capitalists out of the temple, he hated the exploiting classes, his solution would have been far beyond "tax the wealty"

You know there is a solution to this stalling untill companies decide they are ready...

who cares about legality, lets talk about morality, it is 100% moral to punch a nazi and beat the tar out of them, it is also your duty to violate immoral laws, therefor its your duty to beat the tar out of nazis. no self respecting jury will convict...

I am allowing 2 arguments one where we assume both are followed and one where we assume nither are followed, you may pick your path, I have found usualy americans defult to the US constitution being mostly followed but any forgin "evil" country not even looking at theirs

The United states is secular in name only at this point

I have neither claimed nutrality nor have I absaned from chosing, I am merely saying that from where I sit the only material difrence that I see between them is retoric, and maybe 2 years. Biden has done very little to undo anything trump has done and in some cases spead it up. We do not really have a choice all we have is the illusion of a choice

You know how often I have this exact argument in a year IRL, I am a communist, I hear "You wouldn't be allowed to critise the government in a communist country" all the time so I have a habit of once I have to use a constitution of an AES county, or a specific edition I save it

It is a pdf saved to my computer, how the heck do you want me to "coppy a url"

I read the article headline, I too say its false, but I also disagree with you, funny how that can work, we can agree in a boolian statement but disagree with each other, my argument to you is that your starting comment was incorrect and accademicly dishonest

You are free to look it up for yourself, I do not expect yoy tp trust me on absolutely anything, but I am not going to be uploading an entire PDF into a comment

Also if we want to refraim, I will happy argue the PRC is better than The USA, if that is what you would rather be arguing?