Contramuffin @ Contramuffin @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

640

Joined

2 yr. ago

I don't know enough about motherboards to really say for sure, and hopefully someone more knowledgeable can come in to correct anything, but I'd be concerned if that chipped off piece happens to be part of the voltage regulator module. My call is to play it safe with electronics, because worst case scenario is that it could fry other components or catch on fire

PI = principal investigator, or the leader of the lab. Also known as the professor. The closest comparison to regular jobs would be that the PI is the manager. They typically no longer do actual lab work and typically fulfill a role that is entirely managerial, so they're often removed from and therefore entirely oblivious to goings-on of the lab. It's a somewhat common occurrence for lab members to have a concern that the PI dismisses because they're unaware of the severity of the concern, or for the PI to have a concern that lab members have already addressed

Like it or hate it, SteamOS is what the people want. I mentioned in another comment about it. You can argue over what is a better distro all day, but in the end, what's going to cause people to jump ship isn't Bazzite - it's SteamOS. Bazzite makes sense only to the people who already know what each distro is, and attempting to blame Linus (and, by proxy, the portion of his audience wanting to jump ship) for choosing SteamOS over Bazzite is exactly the sort of unwelcoming behavior that I'm concerned will drive away people. There are better and more productive ways of pushing for more established distros, but more importantly than that, we need to accept that SteamOS is a fundamental criterion for this set of audience to make a leap towards Linux, and we should be encouraging them to try out SteamOS instead of bikeshedding over which distro is best for people who have already made up their mind about SteamOS

Whether or not I like him is irrelevant to the point at hand, but since the topic is now brought up, I should point out that I don't watch LTT.

The bigger point here is that a major tech channel with a huge audience seems to be pushing for Linux adoption to a novel audience (having Linux content geared towards Linux enthusiasts does not bring in new users), and a direct consequence of that is that we should 1. expect to welcome an influx of new users to the Linux ecosystem, along with all of the consequences that that entails and 2. acknowledge this video as a symbol of increasing Linux acceptance among mainstream users. The particular channel is itself irrelevant, compared to the bigger fact that such a video was even made at all.

To use your example, it would be like if we were a community of used bathwater enthusiasts and we decided to bury any news about that influencer selling her bathwater.

On the contrary, if someone is able to shoot themselves in the foot and there is a sizeable portion of people who don't immediately think that that person is a bumbling idiot, then things can and should improve from a technological standpoint.

The kind-of-techy gaming crowd is exactly the audience that needs to be targetted for continued improvement of the Linux ecosystem, both because they are the most adjacent to the current target audience and because a not-insignificant portion of them actively dislike Windows and wants an alternative. And if they see that Linus runs into an error and thinks that they might come across a similar error, then that is, in fact, a disservice to the Linux ecosystem that needs to be addressed. It doesn't matter if Linus did it intentionally or not - the fact that many of his viewers think it to be genuine is proof enough that there needs to be more polish.

On a more personal level, I can tell you that that your sort of outlook directly hindered my adoption of Linux. I was part of that exact kind-of-techy gaming crowd at one point, and it took me multiple attempts across almost a decade to really take a substantial leap towards Linux. And throughout all of my previous attempts, the one reason that kept me from adopting Linux earlier was the unshakeable feeling that Linux was made for people who already knew what they were doing, and everyone else gets tossed to the wayside.

That's what Valve understood when they made their Steam deck, and as a direct consequence of that understanding, many of the kind-of-techy gaming crowd want a public release of SteamOS over a much more established Linux distro. And for what it's worth, Linus seems generally positive towards Linux in this particular video, and my interpretation is that his channel will begin to convince more of his audience to try out Linux in the coming months. If nothing else, then it seems worth celebrating that Linux is being talked about in a positive way on a more mainstream channel.

Sure, but LTT is still the mainstream tech outlet. Whatever they say, whether for good or bad, is worth discussing, especially as they are the ones who will overwhelmingly shape the average person's opinions on Linux.

To my eyes, the downvotes here seem like a form of burying our heads in the sand, which IMO should be discouraged as much as possible, as Linux users already have a reputation for being out of touch with the needs and wants of the average user

This seems like a relevant post for this community. Are all these downvotes because people don't agree with the views stated in the video?

It's impossible because emulation technically implies that there are hardware differences between the two systems, and the PS4 is literally just a PC with a special OS. My understanding is that PS4 emulation is more like Wine than a true emulator

Dual boot! Lets you keep one foot in the Windows door in case you need anything in Windows. I also run a Windows VM (Winapps) for small programs that don't run well on Linux and also don't require much processing power

When I'm in that situation, my go-to is "I don't think I can do that today, but I think we should definitely look into that sometime"

This is the one. Polite and professional, and also acknowledges the importance of the other person's viewpoint.

Might consider getting something that only plays well on keyboard/mouse. Factorio comes up off the top of my head. Shooters also generally translate poorly to controllers, so perhaps that?

currently doing PhD

happy with topic

no mention about happiness with life

Yeah that sounds about right

His lemmy app probably has broken formatting

What a slow and ineffective way of taking down a drone. Faster is to just say to it, "Down boy! Heel! Who's a good boy?" and the drone will automatically switch sides

Smoking introduces a lot more chemicals than just nicotine. A lot of health hazards associated with smoking are from the smoke itself, not the nicotine. Vaping allows you to remove the smoke part of the equation. (Vaping also introduces a bunch of hazards on its own, but it's still overall better than smoking)

I think you might be confusing the many worlds hypothesis with something else. Many worlds doesn't explain why the fundamental variables of the universe are the way they are, it describes the wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics. It's one of the most logical conclusions of the double slit experiment (Many worlds is the hypothesis that says that the particle passes through both slits)

Yes, I do, but only because the other theories make even less sense. The 3 main interpretations of the observations made by quantum mechanics are the Copenhagen interpretation, the pilot wave theory, and the many worlds hypothesis. They're made to explain the weirdness of wave-particle duality

The Copenhagen interpretation is the most accepted interpretation, and it (essentially) states that particles are just waves until they are observed, which collapses the wave back into a particle. In other words, the wave is a physical, real thing.

The pilot wave theory says that the particle stays a particle, and the wave that we observe is just a wave of probability that "pushes" the particle along, like a surfer being pushed by a tidal wave.

The many worlds hypothesis agrees with the pilot wave theory in saying that the wave isn't a physical thing, but says that the wave of probability exists because the particle is being split across multiple timelines, and we can only observe 1 timeline, thus making the particle inherently probabilistic.

Out of the 3, the many worlds hypothesis makes the most sense to me. But I don't believe in it in the way that people think about it colloquially. The particle splitting is an extremely small event, so there's probably like a billion timelines that are just exactly like the current one

Scaled and subscribed. There's a lot of other languages and other topics that I don't know much about on All. I'm sure that they're useful, but I don't understand it and I can't meaningfully contribute to it. Subscribed is more curated and therefore more meaningful to me. The key is to be lax with what you subscribe to. Seek out niche communities, and subscribe to communities that may not perfectly fit your interests - you want to diversify your feed, so subscribe to basically everything that you'd be ok with seeing.

Then, sort by Scaled. Hot has a tendency of pushing all the big communities to the top and burying the smaller communities, so you'll just get a ton of news articles in your feed. Scaled will normalize for community size and make for a more diverse feed

Translation appears accurate, but misses the cultural element. In my admittedly limited experience, this is pretty par for the course for Chinese humor. Compared to Western humor, Chinese humor is more brash and abrasive, and almost boastful when viewed from an outside perspective. I can definitely envision someone receiving that sort of response as a joke ("What, you didn't receive game of the year? Why did you even go?"). And it would certainly agree with my impression that he makes a lot of crude jokes on his social media that don't translate well into English (see: the IGN article on how the developers are sexist). It can really be quite difficult for inexperienced people to determine what statements are humorous and what statements are earnest, since the difference is often really subtle, even when read in the original language.

I'm not necessarily defending him, since these sorts of jokes do have a nugget of honesty to them, but my read is that he plays them up for humor.