Skip Navigation

Posts
7
Comments
395
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I hope they break it into a dozen pieces (or better yet, nationalize it) and cast Beef Jesus into the abyss.

  • Crack is a hell of a drug.

  • Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall Wall

  • The chemicals in black face paint have been clinically shown to degrade neural tissue.

  • Death to America!

  • Death to America

  • Death to America

  • Based, death to America, death to the west, death to the colonies.

  • Chonker was cultivating mass like a champion.

  • They didnt actually throw up this time. It was trauma induced auditory hallucinations.

  • Aren't women generally considered lower risk for insurance? Less risk of needing to pay out means more profit for the insurance companies. Plus of course not having your ads shown to 50% of the population. Seems like it should be the advertisers going after Facebook for this directly.

  • I'm in the high hundreds. I clear them every few months when I get to a couple thousand and my browser starts to slow noticeably.

  • Maybe, but are you smart enough not to hint at it on the internet? No.

  • Yea, it’s always been weird to me that Batman alone is being judged for not using lethal force.

    Batman is the focus of the narrative and the audience. Of course he will be the focus of the criticism. But technically yes, a lot of others in universe do also share responsibility for any further victims of the Joker. After a certain number of escape, spree, capture, escape, spree, etc cycles surely they must have realized he cannot be rehabilitated and will continue the remorseless mass killings until he dies.

    or even proximity to him, be morally obligated to kill him?

    This is a compelling idea for sure, and could definitely lead to interesting questions in other cases. Let's say the Joker has a body count of at least 1000 victims, how far back do you have to walk that number before such an obligation is no longer reasonable. Would a serial killer with 40 victims also be such a clear and present danger that they'd represent a moral imperative for their elimination? Or does it have to reach comic book levels of obscene?