Commiunism @ Commiunism @lemmy.wtf

Posts

0

Comments

231

Joined

2 yr. ago

Suspect this might be clickbait, they didn't ban the original wiki. I've asked a friend of mine from Russia to verify this and they were able to access the 'old' wiki, both English and Russian version just fine.

My very first distro was Manjaro actually - I tried it twice but there would always be some graphics related issue I would encounter that I couldn't troubleshoot as a beginner (even though I'd spend a week looking for a solution on forums), and I'd move back to Windows. Finally getting the courage to try out Arch which was considered the "big scary meme distro" was what made me stay with Linux.

The biggest thing for me was that I actually knew what was installed on my system and what the function most of the major programs served (things like xorg, multilib graphics drivers, pipewire/pulseaudio, desktop environments/window managers), so whenever I encountered an issue or wanted to customize something, I would sort of know where to start looking.

Of course, all this depends on the person - not all power users are the same. For me, arch worked best but someone else might gravitate towards fedora, debian or whatever else and their way of doing things.

Arch isn't a bad choice for a new Linux user who was a power user on Windows. You get to actually know what's installed on your system which can really help during the inevitable troubleshooting, though it's definitely a trial by fire when it comes to manual install and setting up the environment.

Recommending Gentoo to a new user though is a war crime.

The west, so afraid of strong government, now has no government. Only financial power. Slogans such as "governments have limited power by design" come from well-paid researchers, think tanks funded by big businesses. It's privately funded propaganda, like the Trilateral Commision in United States, for instance.

99% of distro hoppers quit before finding the perfect distro

0 cause I feel there's not enough content to have subscriptions so I just scroll by top/active.

Damn, I had a malicious version installed on my Arch machine. I've since done a system update which removes the backdoor, but looking more into it, it does seem that only fedora and debian(?) are affected/targeted but better safe than sorry.

It's not the biggest issue I managed to fix, but it was definitely the hardest to figure out a fix for:

Whenever I would boot up any game on my Linux machine I would have microstutters ever so often, and it was frequent and lengthy enough to be very annoying, and thus started my 2 month long quest to figure out what was going wrong.

To cut a long story short, the compositor I was using had suddenly decided to do a breaking update and change the names of the backends they were using.

I also bought into the bit flip theory but it was confirmed that the hardware was somewhat faulty which is an infinitely more likely cause than cosmic rays. There's also the fact that there aren't any bits that could be flipped which would perfectly reproduce the glitch.

Right, in a sense I'll give you some points, as the current left (as in the parties, not the theory) is too disorganized to propose a viable alternative economic model. However, your entire comment comes off as rather disingenuous when it comes to arguing why "Capitalism can't be changed".

You can kick against capitalism all you want, god knows there are good reasons to, but you will never replace it with anything better. If you think life was good during primitive tribalism times, you should only be forced to try it and see.

An alternative to capitalism doesn't mean we go back to monke at all. When looking at things historically, such as the Roman Empire or Feudalism, people didn't live in tribalistic huts or whatever. Technology gave us the ability to build houses, to harness the power of electricity - not capitalism as an economic model.

I’ve seen parts of the world where people currently live in partial cardboard boxes with dirty mattresses as their only furniture. They still live as if the are not part of the modern world. And it isn’t pretty, life there is harsh and the reality of subsistence is extremely difficult.

This has literally nothing to do with Capitalism, but rather just with a country being poor or without proper government/order, though it's way more complicated than that and I'm just simplifying. Also, there are countries in the world under Capitalism who are still developing and have people still living in the conditions you describe, such as in India or parts of Southeast Asia/South America/some African countries.

We kick against capitalism because we want to be moral warriors, but in truth we get a lot from our capitalist way of life; great food, good housing, nice furnishings, a place to hang out hat and plenty of leisure time. Just saying, it’s not all bad, and it’s really better than the alternatives.

First of all, criticizing something bad and/or wanting it to change doesn't make you a "moral warrior", by that logic a cancer researcher who tries to think of a cure is also a "moral warrior" which isn't true. Also, you do realize that in most capitalist countries, things such as "good food, good housing" that you describe are only accessible by middle class people and above, right? If you're poor (which is the majority of people under Capitalism), you might not be able to afford such things or be constantly at risk of losing your housing or whatever. Proposed alternatives such as Socialism have a lot of support because it often aims to bring these things (as in, stable housing, food) to more people when compared to Capitalism, so if you think that

Also as an aside, a very influential author who also stated that "Capitalism is the endpoint there can't be anything better" was Francis Fukuyama, and he wrote a book in 1992 outlining just that. However, even he has changed his views since.

Sorry for the wall of text and if what I write isn't clear - English isn't my first language.

Whenever it breaks, really.

I've had this phone I pretty much got for free since 2016 I believe (2 for 1 offer), and even though battery has gotten pretty weak recently, it works quite well as long as I don't watch videos.

There's pretty much only two ways you can go about it in my experience:

1. Fail forwards and try cobbling something together, constantly using search engines to fix errors or finding libraries or getting help with those libraries. One thing you'd have to figure out is an order of operations - what do you code and in what order, which might be tough for someone new but I'd say it's well worth it.
2. Find some tutorial to a project and try following it (those that have step by step guide on what you should do without letting you copy paste code), then using the knowledge you gain to do the way #1 above to hopefully have an easier time figuring out the order of operations, plan out your program and what you're gonna be coding.

Don't think you can avoid getting hands-on and coding something up by yourself. General coding tutorials can only get you so far and are often harmful if abused too much (aka being stuck in tutorial hell).

still hurts after all these years

Yakuza, older games especially. You have amazing looking fully motion captured cutscenes which sometimes makes you forget that it's a video game due to how realistic it looks, but then you're out of the cutscene and the difference hits like a truck.

love me a pork bean jelly sandwich

Wonder if that's the "alienation of labor" thing Marx was talking about

The best way to fathom this is to have a crippling addiction to Runescape. You can pretty much earn your first million after a week or two of play, after a certain point be able to earn few million a day. However, it can take multiple years for people to earn 1 billion gold, which is needed for some of the strongest equipment in the game.

The secret to not getting banned for toxicity online is to hate yourself more than your opponents or team

Kinda agree, as Marx's critique of Liberalism/Capitalism is top-notch. However, the texts are so hard to read and it feels like you need an university degree to even be able to finish or grasp some of them.

Yes, capitalism leads to major inequality. Other options are out there but also lead to major inequality.

The problem is that other options are not being explored. In the past 200 years (in the western world), pretty much nothing apart from Capitalism has been tried, very few small-scale experiments or anything but even then its for policies such as UBI.

So yes, if you look at poorer regions of the world which are often the only ones trying new things out, you often do see inequality increase but maybe it has something to do with them being poorer regions and all the baggage that comes with it (say, corruption or coups or authoritarianism)? Maybe this also influences the kind of ideologies that get adopted by the ruling class, and how the countries under the new ideology are being ran?

Also, at least in my opinion, this kind of mindset of "this is how the world works so you shouldn't care and live life" feels misguided. I do agree that LARPing on the internet about these things is kind of counter-productive as you're not really achieving any real change, but turning blind eye to injustices happening in your country (or in the world to a lesser extent) is even worse - an ignorance-based call to inaction.