ColeSloth @ ColeSloth @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

5

Comments

3,277

Joined

2 yr. ago

Snopes can leave things unsecured all they want, but the footage of what happened to the cats and dogs is proof. There wasn't any CGI in 1986 and the abusive and stressful situations they did to them was obviously real. But yes, it was Japan instead of China.

https://youtu.be/06jP6yqWEXE

I checked. It was Japan and not China, but the relevancy is that the US in the 80's wouldn't have been allowed to throw a cat off a cliff or get ones pay bitten by a lobster or tossed in a river. Snopes not confirming anything is irrelevant, since there's actual footage of this stuff happening. Do you have a stress free way of throwing a kitten off of a cliff?

https://youtu.be/06jP6yqWEXE

"here. Get bit by this lobster"

Oh, damn. I just made this same comment before scrolling down further and seeing yours.

Come to find out the whole thing was filmed in China.

Go watch Milo and Otis again. Holy shit. They through a fucking kitten off a cliff.

After doing some wtf research, the thing was filmed in China. Those poor kittens and puppies.

*Threw

Too bad LG got out of the phone biz. They had the best dacs and some good phones.

Japan is open about all the weird shit people should keep private, and private about a lot of things the rest of the world would talk to a stranger about.

That means the audio still goes through another DAC, lowering the sound quality, compared to an analog 3.5 jack. Also, who wants to further risk wearing out\vreaking their charge port, jack inputs almost seem like they can't break.

I'm thinking how bullshit it is about how much money that video has made by getting AI art to rip off the rock with what I assume is a shitty song

What were the numbers for people who just got therapy?

Bro; Kudos for choosing a year where it could have legit been Henry the 8ths milk.

I'm not saying the US isn't shit with for profit prisons, but I'm not believing shit for any number that China provides on pretty much anything.

That bat isn't feasible hauling a thousand fish in on a net, though. That's for when I catch some crappie or trout with my fishing pole.

Except it isn't reasonable to think a fish interprets pain feeling "painful" the same way humans do. We don't know that's a fish "hurts".

You filthy casual.

Not in this article, or anywhere else is it currently known what a fish feels in relation to how humans feel pain. Including asphyxiation or hooks. We don't currently have the capabilities to know how a fish interprets that stuff.

Nice fluff piece, but it's still complete speculation as to how fish "feel" when out of water or anything else. Currently, science can't tell if a fish can hurt in the same sense that humans can.

If they come up with something dirt cheap to kill them faster, I'm all for it. No down side to give a fish the benefit of the doubt. This isn't something I'm going to worry about, though.

Don't read so well, do ya?

So the guy who discovered it published a book and named his discovery in his book "aluminum"?

Well case closed. It's aluminum.

Then it looks like his statement makes total cringe sense.