Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CO
Posts
5
Comments
3,298
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Or check his drivers license that shows he uses hand controls, or look in his car to see the hand controls and handicap sticker, or simply look at his legs that you can tell even through his pants that they have zero muscle mass, or run a background check on the woman who had done this to someone else and got arrested for it in the past, or see that the guys house has a wheelchair ramp, or not get an arrest warrant based on one person's accusation, or see that a guy who was married with a family for the past decade had not been living with the woman like 2 days prior to the assault and that the guy has an alibi from several other people during the time of the alleged assault........

    What the fauck else do you need, dude? Are you retarded?

  • It was put out that everyone should change their passwords. That kind of info for like 90 million steam accounts would fetch a much higher price or ransom than some personal info on a bunch of people like names, phone numbers and an address.

  • Then so would statistics from the 60's and 70's and 80's. You don't like hearing what the actual data is because it doesn't fit with your own predetermined narrative, so it must be the data that's wrong. Sounds a lot like Trump. He only believes the polls that claim people love him.

  • Anecdotal and a lack of causation. Saying suicides in women dropped after getting no fault divorce after the 70's is no more a causational fact than saying female suicide rates dropped after the 70's due to Billy Joel releasing his hit single My Life in 1979

  • You could very well be right, but it's just impossible to control for such variables, so we can't say one way or the other with a degree of certainty. Especially considering that a 20% swing in numbers consists of a mere 1 or 2 people per 100,000 difference.

  • Suicides in women in the 1950s and 1960s were actually lower than what they were in the 1980's, so this is a bullshit comparison tweet, where the 1970s happened to have the highest rate and the tweeter is putting a causation to the numbers that may not even have direct causation. I could just as easily claim that vehicle fuel economy improving during the 70's caused a decrease in female suicides.

    Female suicides hit its lowest at around 2000 before trending upwards again.

  • This is kind of a bullshit statistic.

    Female suicides for women have always been low, so the per 100k can vary a bit. In 1970 it was 7.4 per 100k and by 1980 it had dropped to 5.7 per 100k. However, in 1950 and 1960 it was 5.6 per 100k.

    So really the "drop" was due to a single high decade of suicides before going back to the average that it had been at. The drop in suicides after the 1970's was really still a slightly higher rate than the 50s and 60s.

    Also, men commit suicide roughly four to five times more often than women.