CodeInvasion @ CodeInvasion @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

85

Joined

2 yr. ago

Easier said than done, unless one doesn't have money to begin with

I fell like the only way is to become a dictatorship like El Salvador, and then hope the person in power is actually trying to make the country a better place.

Be right back, I'm going to read up on the latest of El Salvador.

Edit: Bukele has good intentions, but it's clear that he justifies the means with the ends, including jailing non-criminal dissenters, removing elected officials, and ignoring the supreme court to do it. Only 30% of the 70,000 jailed (nearly 1% of the country's population) have gang ties according to human rights groups.

At the same time, Bukele has a 90% popularity rating. The people clearly want this. I just wonder how and when the falsely imprisoned might be freed.

The honeymoon phase for Lemmy is over. No one cares anymore about someone expressing themselves (I still do--this is based on my observations).

Nothing about that comment was pretentious. I'm surrounded at work by people with estimated IQ greater than 140, and undoubtedly a few north of 150 (think top academic institutions in the world). That estimation is based on GRE scores and the prestige of the institution.

If anything it makes me doubt those estimations. I can't remember what Derek said his SATs were but I was also surprised because I felt they were low for someone like him. All this just further drives home the idea that IQ does not correlate with success, maybe even in science communication.

But apparently making an observation is seen as pretentious and boastful to you.

Do you always reduce everything you read to a false dichotomy or do you simply like being abrasive?

Frankly, it was much lower than I expected. As a PhD Physicist who leads a very successful career in science education, I expected him to score at least 140, and would not have been surprised to see 150.

Tenet is criminally under rated at 69%. Easily one of my favorite movies of all time.

I don't go around using that word because of how many people find it disrespectful. But, and I ask this out of honest curiousity, why is it offensive in the first place?

I see it as synonymous with 'idiot' or 'stupid' when used colloquially. The argument that it's a medical term doesn't really hold as 'idiot' and 'moron' are also medical terms that refer to a lacking of intellectual acuity. In many ways 'retarded' has the same meaning both colloquially and medically. To be mentally retarded is to be mentally slowed or lacking that similar mental acuity that 'idiot' or 'moron' convey.

Retarded just means slow and it's a perfectly apt description. Where I think people get confused is when retardation is linked with a specific attribute like physical retardation or emotional retardation, those convey very different meanings.

I'm not saying that we should start using it again, but that I find it odd how society has latched onto a very specific word and labelled it as bad in the matter of a decade. At the end of the day, any word that can be used to insult or demean, is rude. It's not the word being used, it's what is meant by them. The term 'Cis-gender ' is also being used in a highly exclusionary way and often times is conveyed as an insult. However, it's real meaning is not insulting in the least.

The only upside I can think of is they'd actually start caring about the planet instead of thinking they'll be dead in 100 years anyway.

A lot of people in this situation have already tried everything, and they are complaining on the internet because they feel like there is nothing else they can do. Most people won't even complain about it with their friends. I know I didn't until one day I got drunk camping. That was the trigger for me to do something about it, because it was clearly eating away at me.

I had many conversations with my wife following that, and how much our sexless marriage really bothered me, but that I am still completely and totally in love with her. We don't have kids, so there's not anything keeping us together. We agreed to an open relationship with our rules, and each of us has a veto which could stop the arrangement at any time. We are still completely committed to one another and love spending time together. Things haven't been better, now when I think about being with another woman, I don't need to feel guilty about it.

And I think this is the natural state of humanity. Everyone needs a long-term partner for stability and to care for one another, but people always felt the need to cheat as well. Monogamy is as core to our DNA and survival as is Adultery. But because we've talked about it, there is no sneaking around necessary, no lying. We are completely honest with each other on everything.

I regularly convert between the two just by remembering the conversions for 10, 20, 30, and 40. It's actually pretty easy.

• 0C is 32F (of course)
• 10C is 50F
• 20C is 68F (a cool room temp)
• 30C is 86F (reciprocal of 20)
• 40C is 104F

If you ever forget what one of them is, then just add 18F for every 10C from the last one you remember.

Do pilots count?

Recommend an EV today in NA? It depends on your use-case. Do you ever want to drive cross country in any meaningful amount of time? Your answer is unfortunately Tesla because of their vast charging infrastructure.

Do you want a city driving and will reserve your cross country driving to a gas powered vehicle? Just about any other EV would be better.

All CEOs are assholes, so to the people who say not to buy just because of a CEO are just reactionary fools.

Elon is also CEO is SpaceX, but SpaceX is by far the biggest disruptor to commercial space that has ever existed. Granted its success is all thanks to SpaceX President Gwen Shotwell, and not Elon.

I wholeheartedly agree with the purpose of this community and what it advocates for, but I wanted to add some rebuttals to your points.

2. You mention you have the privilege of not using your car. In car centric parts of the world, which is anything that isn't a big city, this is a privilege. My family that lives in a town of 50,000 people in Germany still need to use their cars every day! There is only a bus system to get them around. Each working age adult uses their car every day! Including the one who lives in Köln and literally walks across the street to his office because car transportation is far more time efficient than transit.
3. See anecdote above. I live in Boston, which is supposedly extremely transit friendly and the T and commuter rail, while remarkably extensive, are abysmal. I rode it for two months until I finally gave up and got a car. I live in a house 0.5 miles from the commuter rail station and it's the cheapest around at $750k, I should be able to have reliable transport to MIT/Kendall.
4. Your issues with driving, being honked at, being annoyed with lack of right of way, all seem to come from inexperience driving in the city. On roads with speed limits of 30 mph, there is no right of way, it's just about whoever goes first. After some time, you learn what to expect from locals and adapt to their style. But I understand if driving in a big city makes people uncomfortable. There is a lot going on, and a lot to pay attention to.
5. Schedule. My god is our transit schedule awful. Commuter rail only once every hour. It's either 5 minutes early or 20 minutes late regularly. So it's completely unreliable. The Red line is now slow as fuck. Crawling at 10 mph in most areas now. It's faster to ride your bike between stations, and get stopped by every traffic light than it is to ride the train. And now the red line only has service every 20-30 minutes!

I loved visiting London. We even got a rental to see things like Stonehenge or Brighton, but I never felt the need to use the car much within the city. While I thoroughly enjoyed driving through parts of London like tiny bridges that had inches of clearance on either side of the vehicle, or massive roundabouts near Victoria station, I never needed to do that for local journeys.

It takes 30 minutes for me to drive to work, but 50-90 minutes to go by public transit and I literally live in a massive transit corridor with service from my house directly to work. It's absolutely absurd. Essentially, transit only broadly works in US if you live in NYC. It's too sparse in SF to be used widely. Too sparse in DC. Chicago is 10 times worse with it's urban sprawl. And unreliable as fuck in Boston. Boston doesn't even have a reasonable train to the goddamned airport (yes I know about the blue line, but it's still a 15 min bus from the blue line station, and you can only transfer to the blue line from the green line).

This is why people drive. Because for the vast majority off us, even those in Europe, there is no better alternative. If transit was so much cheaper, then why doesn't every village of 10,000 people in Europe have a tram? There are simply too many places people want to go, and only extreme density can make transit cost effective.

As I understand defederation, it only blocks their content from showing up here. But not the other way around.

Everything posted here, every comment, vote, etc. is completely public and anyone can collect that data. So the argument that Meta is scraping data therefore we should defederate is nonsensical.

It is too soon to defederate with Meta, and it's extremely reactionary and ineffective if the sole motivation is to hurt Meta or protect our data. Defederation accomplishes none of that. It only makes communities on Lemmy look immature and capricious by defederating from a company along the rationale of FACEBOOK BAD.

All politicians, including Bernie must cater to the rich and wealthy. It's our jobs as voters to discern the true reason why they do it. It's a cruel reality that without the support of the wealthy, no one will make it to congress to effect change. Every successful politician knows this very well. They know not to bite the hand that feeds, so each one (*that works for progress and not personal gain) must walk a very thin line to effect that change while also making sure they aren't removed from office for fear that whatever they did could quickly be undone.

Bernie is in it for the right reasons. Biden and Clinton were in it for the right reasons. Having personally interacted with a few politicians in private settings (no cameras or hidden recorders) I can say that even some Republicans are in it for the right reasons, but differ in ideology and how to effect that change. In the end they play a fictional role when tv cameras are around.

Personally, I was most impressed by my interactions with Marco Rubio of all people. He's exceptionally bright, and cares very deeply about the protection of this country, and it's a very good thing he is vice chairman (or chairman during Republican senates) of the Senate Intelligence Committee as it seems to be his calling. It's just unfortunate that in front of the cameras, he needs to dumb himself down in order to get elected by Republican voters.

As an Alaskan voter, ranked choice is the only reason we have a female, Native American, Democrat congressional representative instead of Sarah Palin filling Don Young's deep red legacy. RCV is equitable and works, but not in the way progressives hope. It allows for the most centrist candidate to be chosen that appeals to the most possible people. A two party system just becomes a battle of political extremes. And like it or not, being progressive is far left for a reason, especially in America. And I consider myself fairly progressive leaning.

The same argument could be said for an apartment building too. We need to collectively realize that Single Family Houses are a luxury that most of us will never see in our lifetimes. Our grandparents were able to enjoy them at low prices because the US had half the population it does today.

Restrictive building codes that only permit building SFH is the cause of our housing shortage and not short term rentals that consist of 0.2%-1% of all dwellings.