Cocodapuf @ Cocodapuf @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

1,343

Joined

2 yr. ago

The article says she's a "legal permanent us resident". It's a little weird that she's been living in the US for 37 years and never got her citizenship. I wonder what that's about.

Does anyone know what other nations fall into this "sensitive" classification?

Edit: I did some googling myself and here's the list below. (The short version is: Russia and their allies, China and their allies, and broadly the middle east. Weirdly, also Taiwan)

•         Algeria
    

•         Armenia
    

•         Azerbajan
    

•         Belarus
    

•         China (PRC)
    

•         Cuba
    

•         Georgia
    

•         Hong Kong
    

•         India
    

•         Iran
    

•         Iraq
    

•         Israel
    

•         Kazakhstan
    

•         Korea (North)
    

•         Kyrgyzstan
    

•         Libya
    

•         Macau
    

•         Moldova
    

•         Pakistan
    

•         Russia
    

•         Sudan
    

•         Syria
    

•         Taiwan
    

•         Tajikistan
    

•         Turkmenistan
    

•         Ukraine
    

•         Uzbekistan
    

I realize that's a long list, I don't know, should I put that in a or code block or spoiler tag?

I've been playing a lot of terraria with my son recently, it's been a lot of fun going back to it. Coincidentally, I just saw the trailer for Noita for the first time last night, and thought "woah, that looks cool as hell..."

Best answer.

I'm going to develop a new AI designed to remove watermarks from AI generated content. I'm still looking for investors if you're interested! You could get in on the ground floor!

You could use it as the logic board for a micro drone, something the size of a dime perhaps. Or other applications where weight or space are extremely limited. Another example might be a medical implant of some sort, this is small enough that it could be a part of a device that is meant to be placed inside an artery, or an eyeball, or an ear canal.

To be fair, it is really hot...

I see the Trek reference, but I feel like I'm still missing something...

Well that's been my policy so far. Since there are literally no controls whatsoever over the content in Roblox, it looks like my kid will be old enough to play Halo before he's old enough to play Roblox.

I have no problem with this, there are a lot of games out there.

You know what would increase government efficiency? We could completely disband the department of homeland security.

The entire agency is a redundant racist waste of money. There's literally no reason for it to exist except for unfounded white fear.

This is semantics, because that's the same thing.

If you want to sell now you have to sell at a lower price, to have your put orders at the top of the stack. So the reason they were selling a lower price was just that they actually wanted to sell.

Sure, you can put an order to sell at some optimistic price, and that won't effect the stock price, but simply having a put order on a stock is not actually the same as wanting to sell. People actually wanting to sell now lowered the stock price.

Thanks, heh, I just came back to look at what I'd written again, as it was 6am when I posted that, and sometimes I say some stupid shit when I'm still sleepy. Nice to know that I wasn't spouting nonsense.

Well, while it is possible that the military does provide a nonviolent strategy along with their other ideas, do know that Trump will reject that out of hand. As I mentioned earlier, he's not interested in "bad deals", and any deal like this would have to at least be not terrible for Panama, and anything that doesn't cripple Panama will be "a bad deal".

That leaves Trump with only military force, I'm afraid he has no choice, his hands are tied... 🙄

Lol, finance (and thus financial reporting) is so braindead.

I'll summarize the whole article: Why did RDDT crash? "Because the stock price went down. Some people sold the stock, so more people sold it, now the price is lower"

Thanks Yahoo finance, this is the journalism we rely on you for...

That sounds like a you problem.

"Our business is so bad and barely viable that it can only survive if you allow us to be overtly unethical", great pitch guys.

I mean that's like arguing "our economy is based on slave plantations! If you abolish the practice, you'll destroy our nation!"

Who would take him?

Yeah, I believe you. This was relatively predictable from him.

Sigh... Worst timeline.

I have no idea what you're saying...

What is not frightening about planning to start a war? Are you saying that you could take the canal without starting a war? What other way of acquiring it are you thinking of? What other strategies do you think exist? When you ask the military to come up with multiple strategies to accomplish something, you're really asking them "would we have to put troops on the ground, or could we do this with a bombing campaign? What about the threat of violence and an illegal embargo?". But if you employ the military in any strategy they come up with, you're starting a war.

I mean, I guess we could offer to buy it, but it's a cornerstone of their economy, we wouldn't like the price. And Trump doesn't go in for "bad deals" (paying for things).

Is this news?

Probably throw planes at you.