Clinicallydepressedpoochie @ Clinicallydepressedpoochie @lemmy.world

Posts

314

Comments

2,802

Joined

1 yr. ago

When Republicans push media narratives like this it always seems some details are being left out.

It's not my particular place to lay out the details in this case. I suspect there are other people who are much better suited but my interpretation is they had paperwork to arrest in a public venue. The court was not said venue. The Judge then purposefully directed him to leave using an alternative exit to prevent his arrest. The legality of that action is what's in question.

I support David Hoggs intentions. I just don't know if he picked the right way to go about it.

Is that really what you want them doing?

If that were the entire story, maybe I agree, but it doesn't sound like that's the entire story.

I need to know if they have broke any laws by doing so. I don't care if it's a judge. I can't be advocating for the trump administration follow rule of law and at the same time advocating anyone democrat leaning bending the rules to their liking. At no point has any one I consider a legal authority laid out the federal governemnts case and the judges case.

I may very well be on OPs side but what I see is a lot of dust getting kicked up and that usually means the trump propaganda machine is ramping up. It's looks like bait to me and it's probably a case the federal government will easily win in the court of public opinion so I'm not going to stick my neck out when it means my credibility is on the line when discussing other, more pressing, matters like Abrego Garcia.

Remember Debbie Wasserman Shultz and how everyone was pissed at her for pulling strings for Hilary?

We don't need to recreate that.

I think there could be arguments that the DNC could set their agenda and eject anyone who opposes it but just trying to root people out through back door deals is not great.

This thread is one of the most bizarre things I've ever created. It's wonderful.

Funding opponents of incumbents you don't like is tantamount to picking winners.

It's fine to do it but not from the position he is in.

I mean, they have a point. DNC chairs shouldn't be picking winners. Hogg is free to make his own path. If there is internal corruption he should start by exposing it.

The DNC? Will never happen. They need to be afraid of the people and for all their bluster I've never seen them do anything but capitulate.

Damn this is exactly what I thought.

Counter, awareness of your countries impending doom.

I'm not saying any of your points aren't salient but I saw this story and thought nothing of it, at first. Take it for what it is, the details aren't entirely clear to me, yet. I'm not going to be like the GOP and follow marching orders just because I read a comment online.

Edit:

I expected the down votes and it's really sad you won't even hear me out.

Edit2:

How's does it feel to be a victim of media narrative? Just letting them jerk your chain because you have no chill?

I've only seen sniveling cowards in the trump administration, no men.

His stated strategy was to allow trumps policies to destroy the gop themselves and prevent subterfuge that would allow them to scape goat the DNC.

So far, it's working. Trump owns every part of this economy.

I would have liked more direct action but who knows what would have happened otherwise.

Damn, min/maxing food and lifestyle. That's why you're the professor.

Yo man, if you ever need a spotter, like just call me over.

I mean, really, you have to ask?

Whoa, so like your tolerance will get real low so when you're old that shits going to really hit. That's smart dude. I'll call you the professor.