Clinicallydepressedpoochie @ Clinicallydepressedpoochie @lemmy.world

Posts

314

Comments

2,802

Joined

1 yr. ago

new york accent

Hey, I'm postin' yere.

Fat lazy coward checking in

Let me guess, one of those innocent until proven guilty types when its your favorite pedo.

I would drop off the face of the earth only to stash porn mags all over the woods.

Epstein ring a bell?

I just see his defense fund growing while knowing it's all for naught. Waiting for the day everyone becomes surprised pichachu because....

How do you know any prediction is true? What evidence would satisfy you?

Chuck Schumer is running the bet that the GOP will implode before the whole country goes up in flames.

It's solely a hedge to save his party and capture as much power as possible.

Maybe it works but it was never for you. Unless you believe the democrats are actually "elites" that deserve to be in charge.

Personally, I think their time has come and gone and it's a crying shame they were never once put together well enough to do something for those that come after.

Clownworld brought to by ass blasting supreme^tm ceral and fast food, it's meatacular!

Consumes Simpsons enough to adopt it as an ideology.

"I'm wicked smhart."

I'm not here to be a doomer but net neutrality was murdered.

Hey. I got lots of good responses without doing anything. Don't want to jinx it.

Any examples of Wikipedia trying to rewrite history?

What studies? Just fucking link them.

Go on, now. Cya.

I didn't back him. I didn't sign up. Can I be excused please?

I'm curious. Examples?

In my mind that would be killing it.

From the first link:

One epidemiologic study looked at a population exposed to chloramine in its drinking water and used the disease risk as a baseline for comparing the risk in a population exposed to chlorine in its drinking water. These findings will be addressed only briefly as they are not directly relevant to this document.

Have you looked through the second link? It's all about EPA methods. If I felt further discussion with you might be productive I might investigate some of the citations. I just think you're accusing me of one thing and I'm saying something entirely different.

Don’t forget some studies on the benefits

Are you suggesting chlorine is actually good for you, not that it has antibacterial properties that makes the water safer for consumption?

I'll skip the chlorine safety stuff because I asked for a study.

As far as the toxicity stuff I'm not concerned because you're still talking about concentration (see. Dilution).

If you had any tact you would understand that I'm not trying to say chlorine is unsafe for human consumption I'm saying that the goal of science isn't to determine every possible outcome of consuming it.

Anyway. You'll just have disregard me because we aren't communicating on the same level.

Again, you're talking about a dilution. Is a glass of water with trace amount of chlorine, chlorine?

I'd gladly review any study, that you're aware of, that states there are no longer term effects of drinking trace amounts of chlorine. That is, since it's such a walk in the park to do.

Tech bros like musk who capture companies to gut them.