Clent @ Clent @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

806

Joined

2 yr. ago

My point is that they aren't pushing or nudging, they are making a demand

This statement is why no one likes vegans. You're demanding that someone adhere to your believe system. It doesn't matter how well you can argue your rationale, the demand itself is the reason.

It's the same level of insufferableness as Christian Warriors.

To summarize: You hate phrasing the indicates solidarity. Further, you feel you are entitled to a specific level of discourse and consider anyone who does not pass this gate you keep to be toxic. To that I say: NO U!

With pay of course.

Then a medal for bravery against a magnet.

Later a promotion after his buddies clear him of all wrong doing.

Yes. We must know where they live so we can shit on their country to make ourselves feel better.

'Merica!

I have a family plan but it's not for any reason other than my children use it and I can afford to pay to reduce their ad exposure. We live in a swing state so they were previously bombarded with political advertising.

The way I see it, I swapped the Netflix account for a YouTube account because that's what the kids favor now. If they move on, I will drop it immediately. If the price goes up then I am very likely to drop it. It's already overpriced for what it is.

Why would two dead women affect their ideology when dozens upon dozens of dead children has not?

Or a mini loaf pan at half the price and twice the capacity.

Indeed, I did.

This isn't a generational problem. It exists across all generations. Looks more like narcissism

But my corporate overlords arranged for a republican to speak at a company event. Surely if my corporate overlords vote for them, then I should vote for them too.

Didn't you know that voting is like clothing.

Vote for the socioeconomic position you want not the socioeconomic position you have!

Any day now and I'll be a billionaire!

You really think someone would do that, just go on the internet and tell lies?

You ai bots aren't fooling me!

wouldn't take it at face value

Exactly the fucking point. They didn't want to take South Africa's desires at face value either.

May I suggest.

Click on a state to see its polling over time.

Now that everyone knows these exist they have to do a couple obvious fakes to draw away attention away from the insidious ones.

Reasonable. If they're going to witch hunt, we need to make sure they aren't witches first.

Usenet is the way but I've never witnessed someone who torrents see the light in a penny comment thread. Few people truly understand opsec and how to quantify their own risk surface, but those who do will gravitate towards Usenet.

Speed is also a factor. Casuals don't understand what it is to grab a release before a torrent has found the first seeder.

Narco trafficking sounds like a good incentive to get rid of drone operators. Wouldn't want them capturing footage of those operations

No. This person literally says they started it. It's not the same because it's not a false accusation. This is being reported by new outlets who verified their sources. It's journalism not a witch hunt, it's not my personal failing for not recognizing the vast difference here.

Yeah. Not the same thing.

Pointing the finger at someone who was not involved in anyway is something very very different.

This person literally got the ball rolling. They are not an uninvolved participating in the event.

Wanting to see it as similar is about you and leads me to believe you were at least a passive participant in the witch hunting of the bomber suspect. Perhaps not, but you are clearly over fitting that specific series of event to this current event for a reason that is personal to you.