ClassStruggle @ ClassStruggle @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

327

Joined

12 mo. ago

They're not even Republicans from 10-20 years ago. They're Republicans from five years ago.

She was pandering to moderate to more right wing conservatives.

Even where there is no prospect of achieving their election the workers must put up their own candidates to preserve their independence, to gauge their own strength and to bring their revolutionary position and party standpoint to public attention. They must not be led astray by the empty phrases of the democrats, who will maintain that the workers’ candidates will split the democratic party and offer the forces of reaction the chance of victory. All such talk means, in the final analysis, that the proletariat is to be swindled. The progress which the proletarian party will make by operating independently in this way is infinitely more important than the disadvantages resulting from the presence of a few reactionaries in the representative body. If the forces of democracy take decisive, terroristic action against the reaction from the very beginning, the reactionary influence in the election will already have been destroyed.

Karl Marx 1850, Address of the Central Committee to the Communist League

Writing letters to politicians and making phone calls isn't going to do shit, they only answer the money and we don't have it.

If genocide isn't someone's red line, they're in no position to be voting.

Is anyone surprised after hearing her acceptance speech?

Hollow meaningless words when they have the ability to get no one killed.

Like Israel, the DNC refuses to acknowledge they exist