Skip Navigation

Posts
2
Comments
3,121
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • "I didn't realize there were more than 2 lines to the poem.'

    -MAGAts

  • It's Canada benefiting from the money that was already allocated or was that done in the first place to appease the States?

    If it wasn't for Canada's benefit then we definately should reallocate it if the tariffs actually happen this time.

  • Trying to win an argument online

    Well there's your problem...

  • Are the tariffs "definitely happening this time" until Canada promises to do something they already agreed to again?

  • Your second paragraph first sentence is just your first paragraph of question last post rephrased as confident conclusions with absolutely no facts or information inbetween. in either. It’s weird, man. Is this AI? Why am I held to a different standard than you? That’s not how it works.

    It feels like an idea born straight out of a boardroom meeting to lessen the effects of protests

    Ah, but "get yourself kicked out of stores", something the only mildly annoys the workers and doesn't affect the owners at all, THAT will have the billionaires shaking in their boots!

    This entire thread is you trying to lessen then effects of protests. If I'm misunderstanding you then try taking the boot out of your mouth before speaking.

  • So not purchasing from a store for a day isn't going to affect the store, but getting yourself kicked out of the store for not wearing shoes will?

    Your saying not making purchases for a day will have no effect, but your counter suggestion will have no greater impact on the store but require a greater buy-in from the people taking part.

    I'll try to spell it out again: this is the lowest possible bar to get people to take part. If successful, it shows everyone how many people are willing to take at least some action, which makes it easier to organize more meaningful action in the future.

  • everyone could go out that day and intentionally get trespassed from a store they don't like. Not as a group, individually throughout the day. It doesn't have to be violent or even illegal, just break policy - go in without wearing shoes or something.

    "How exactly do you gauge the effects? Because just gauging the support and nothing else feels like the literal definition of performative action."

  • It's a warning. If you can get enough people to do it for 1 day to cause an impact, then you can do it for 2 days, then 3...

  • It's a first step to gauge the amount of support for the cause. If you can't convince people not to purchase things for just one day your sure as fuck not going to be able to convince them to not go to work.

    If you support a boycott or general strike then I hope you're willing to do the bare minimum of not making purchases on one specific day even if you think it isn't going to much.

  • It demonstrates organization and support. If a significant number of people make no purchases on one day it shows a lot of support for the cause and it's a warning that there are enough people paying attention that it can get much worse.

    Conversely, if you can't even get people to stop buying things for 1 day what are the chances you can have a successful strike or boycott?

    It's a first step, it's not the last one.

  • Baby learned a new word and it's eager to show it off.

  • But they said Musk is not a federal employee, so why is he issuing ultimatums?

    I hereby order US federal workers to not report to work on Monday or resign.

  • Criminals aren't allowed to run for president either. Here we are.

  • Can you name 10 women in women's sports? Or do you not actually give a shit about women's sports and this is just an excuse for hatred and bigotry?

  • It's time to remind the military that the only moral response to an unethical order is to ignore it.

  • Anger without action is irrelevant.

    They don't care how angry people are because they know they will do nothing other than complain.

  • I want off this ride

    Time for player 2 take action.

  • I would love to see a scenario where every different kind of journalist from all backgrounds, of all opinions,

    Conspiracies George, who never went to school and thinks oxygen is a government plot, but has his own "news" website should not have been included in the funding.