Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
7
Comments
362
Joined
7 mo. ago

  • Part of what's nice about the game is that it's pretty breezy and no grinding required. As long as you don't reel at the thought of turn-based combat it's very low barrier to entry.

  • They'll do just fine as long as they deliver him what he wants.

  • For anybody who thinks that animals in their natural environment are all happy...yeah imagine living for decades without any sort of dental care. Evolution is about surviving, not thriving.

  • Him gutting the VA isn't real popular in red states either.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The sweet release of death

  • Some cats don't overeat. I have one of them. He just grazes a little bit when he's hungry. I switched him to wet food as he got older, though, so now I have to refill his bowl pretty frequently so the food doesn't sit out too long.

  • Noice

    Jump
  • Nothing wrong with eating ass but probably get to know the ass pretty well before eating it.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Not hard enough.

  • Seriously, if one guy cooked it up during a hackathon and then later left the company, I wouldn't be shocked.

  • GOG doesn't really do much to maintain the Galaxy app unfortunately. The idea of being able to put your entire library into one launcher is appealing but half of the plugins don't even work. Even the steam one is broken out of the box these days (there is a newer version on GitHub, but I don't think it's official). So them not porting to Linux is unsurprising.

  • Concerning that it's this easy for them to spam so many people. She might be exposing how easy Lemmy is to exploit. Does each instance have to maintain its own ban list?

  • As another large footed individual, at least you've got the internet. Finding large shoes was really painful when you had to drive to brick and mortar stores and hope they stocked your size.

  • I mean, the counter-argument is, why spend time on issues that not even your own voters agree on? I think the majority of voters, on either side of the aisle, probably do not actually know any trans people personally, which is why it's so easy for Rs to paint them as what they want. That lack of personal stakes makes it hard issue for people to get behind. And, frankly, I think there's a lot of assuming in online discussions that every democratic voter is on board with the idea that sex and gender are different things, but I think in actuality rather a lot of them are probably either uncomfortable with the idea or just unsure. And then when you get into questions like whether prepubescent children should be able to medically transition...there's just going to be a lot of people not on board with that, which is precisely why it's a point Republicans hammer on.

    Here's what I think really gets to the root of why Newsom is doing this: a lot of those Democratic voters probably feel like they can't express their true feelings on the matter for fear of being labeled a transphobe. So Newsom is, in essence, giving cover to those people (who are probably a significant portion of the liberal wing of the party) to say "maybe I'm not really fully on board with all this trans stuff yet," specifically picking out women's sports to rally around because polling shows that people are overwhelmingly against trans women participating in women's sports. And it also serves as him separating himself from those Democrats, i.e. the ones who completely fucked up what may have been the most important election in the history of the country. This is a very calculated maneuver, and it probably has nothing to do with his personal beliefs - because he's a politician and I don't think successful politicians believe in much of anything. And I think you will see lots of other Dems do similar.

  • Not placing a value judgement on this, but you can probably expect a lot of Dems to distance themselves on trans issues. It's a group of issues that takes up a lot of air, and divides the party, while uniting republicans.

  • Not really, no. You can block communities that allow those types of posts, however.

    Edit: I say this because I'm making a couple of assumptions here. Mainly that you're not talking about direct links to onlyfans, but rather the people who post pictures of themselves to tangentially related communities trying to lure people into clicking on their profile where they have a link to their onlyfans. You can certainly block individual users so that might be good enough. As for blocking links to specific domains I don't think that's supported on the web client (it would a nice feature) but it might be available in some of the apps.

  • Very low cost cosplay

  • This seems paranoid to a silly degree

    Edit: Oh it's police propaganda, no wonder it's bad.

  • Yeah, waterfall would be "you collect requirements to build a rocket to Mars, 2 years later you have a rocket to Venus and it turns out they didn't think oxygen is essential, they'll have to add that in the next major release."

  • This is pretty common, banks are where new notes are released into circulation.