ChubakPDP11+TakeWithGrainOfSalt @ ChubakPDP11 @programming.dev

Posts

0

Comments

70

Joined

1 yr. ago

I think digraphs and trigraphs are part of the preprocessor? I did not add any preprocessor stuff to this grammar. I am adding them to the new version I am working on.

I have read the C17 standard fully and I did recall it from memory from time to time but it seems like I had forgotten a lot of stuff. I am redefining it, and I am redigning my AWK grammar too.

I am hoping I could perhaps make a Github pages website called Internet Grammar Database and have all sorts of grammar inside it. Thoughts?

Not with this grammar. There's this parser-generator-immedate called BNFC that uses it's own flavor of BNF (Labeled BNF) to generate Yacc/Lex (or ANTLR when can), an abstract syntax tree, etc, but I don't like it. There are no EBNF parser generators AFAIK. One could, possibly, feed this to ChatGPT and ask for a Yacc/Lex pair in return, or even a manual parser! I may do that, but I first have to clean this up and add stuff that aren't there.

ChatGPT has changed langdev a lot for me. I automate a good portion of the processo with it. But one needs solid specs to feed to it.

As I said I wish to implement the frontend myself, basically the lexer/parser. But I kinda get bored with LP because it's too time-consuming. Plus LR(1) can only be generated, it's only LL(1) which can be hand-written. I have not decided yet. I wish to focus more on the backend, because that is where you can do innovative shit and perhaps, write a paper on it.

Also, I'm going to leave C23 to people who have years of experience. ANSI C is the lower denomniator of C. I am using C99 standard, which should be able to compile a good portion of code bases. C99 is the last required POSIX standard for C. That's when C went under ISO.

Thanks.

Uh this one was back of my mind. Thanks!

Thanks man, also noted your advice.

Yeah!

Nobody even said anything.

I hope so.

Verbose and ugly! Btw, check out this S-Expression parser in C I wrote several months back: https://gist.github.com/Chubek/d2f0ac9067521716d2ab31c93948e885

It's truly *easy to parse them!

Depends on what repositories/archives your Pacman pulls from. But you can just build Cool-Retro-Term yourself: https://github.com/Swordfish90/cool-retro-term

This also has an AppImage you could use.

I do believe other people have pointed out what went on that caused this to happen. This thread was a joke, but I did learn a lot from it.

This makes so much sense! The other guy said they were planning an S-Expression language like Scheme... I think, had Netscape supported Scheme, the trajectory of the craft would change. At least we would not get so many 'durr parenthesis' memes. Just how hard is it to use [Neo]Vim when you're writing S-Expressions? it keeps highlighting the paranthesis and brackets balance as I write. What text editor do people who hate S-Expression LISP-like languages use, Emacs? Lol.

Frankly one can learn any imperative language once one learns one. It's the standard library of a language and the quirks of the library that is the real challenge .The syntx of the language doesn't boggle anyone.

I used to use IE when I was like 12~13 --- I think I switched to FF when I was 13.5 and never looked back. Just the tabs man. I use Pop_OS! these days and a few months ago I accedentally enabled tiling, then it I realized it has tabs. I am as happy as I were back then. Tabs are a concept that were thought of too late.

btw this document mentions JScript. I don't know WTF is that but when I google normal JS comes up.

Good info dump. Can't image S-Expressions in web dev today really. Also, I did not mean it maliciously, this is a stupid thing after all.

I give it half-baked code and ask it to complete it. Like say a few days ago, I wanted to implement NFA and Thompson Consturction. So I wrote this:

    
struct Transition {
   // implement this
  Transition *next;
};

struct NFA {
  // implement this
};

// and so on and so forth

  

This is how you get good results from it. Do half the work.

Wow are you from the future? Because I just had this exact same thought, that JS is just that 'process', so I read the ECMA-262 standard and I posted the new thread about something funny I found in it. In fact I said something that closely resembles what you said. It's just freaky!

It's a term that generally refers to the more 'mathematical' side of programming, as opposed to the more 'practical' side of things. I believe it means 'Data Structures and Algorithm' so its a generalization of 'meaty' programming. Think, someone who writes shell scripts does not need 'DSA' to oil his grind, but someone needing to write a compiler does.

Now we live at an age where you can generate a shell script with a simple prompt, and hell, you could piece-meal a compiler, but it's not as straightforward. If one wishes to make moola in the post-LLM world, one needs to have strong theoretical and constitutional foundation.

At this point, any employer who hires more than 1 person for the 'simple tasks' is doing charity. And charity ain't what employers known for!

That is not to say, don't use AI in your work. I believe AI is the BEST way to learn DSA. In fact I straightened a lot of my misconceptions using ChatGPT. Like, I have written 2 compilers and abandoned them because I never meant to finish them, it was an excuse to prompt ChatGPT with more complex requests and do some reckon on my knowledge. I managed to do 'basic' SSA with ChatGPT, and anyone who has read a compiler book or taken a class knows SSA is not easy. I generated the SSA, and confirmed with the SSA book that I had. IT was very decent. But ther SSA book was very 'crude' and ChatGPT's example was really, well, 'uncrude'? So it was a GIANT help in me understanding SSA.

So if you need to learn DSA, I can recommend these three steps:

1- Learn a functional language or LISP-like language, Scheme, Racket, OCaml, SML, Haskell, etc. These langauges are extremely fluid and scientific.

2- Read books. Just go on Libgen or Zlibrary and read books. I recommended SIpser's above (or was it in another post?) but there's dozens. I remember a book called "Grokking Algorithms" which was really good. I read this book when I was sick with Covid, Steven Skiena's "The Algoritmh Design Manual" and it seems like everyone just LOVES this book. I mean it, try it, it's the best. If you can, buy it, because it's very precious. Also, keep a copy of CSLR/CLSR or whatever as a reference on your desk, PC everywhere.

3- Piece-meal ChatGPT into designing you a complex application. It really helps if you got an aim. One thing I recommend is Genealogy software. Make a Genealogy DSL perhaps. Or a simple compiler.

My advice may not be sound, but some aspects of these were helpful for me.

I think you are irresponsible towards your future if you are a gainfully employed self-taught programmer, and don't invest in formal education. If you say 'I don't have time!' well, consider this, even night classes in junior colleges teach you stuff you don't know. Go to them, get your associates. I am in the process of getting into a contract where I do some thankless jobs for someone I know, he in exchange pays me to go to college. I am 31 -- as I said in the other thread, THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING A LATE-COLLEGER!

I have been to college, I have studied 3 subjects for a total of 9 semesters, I have no degree to show for any of them :( I quit English lit, French lit and "Programming" all after 3 semesters. But when I was studying French lit, there was a guy in our class who was SIXTY-FIVE YEARS OLD! He wanted to learn French to open up some a commerce consulting office, focusing on import/export from France.

What I wanted to do was to 'write', keep in mind, 'write', not 'draw' bande dessine! But now that I am older and hopefully wiser, I have a set goal in mind. I am going to go this 'boutic' college near our home to study Electronics Engineering and when push comes to shove and China makes its move, start a chipset engineering firm with a production wing.

Just like how electronics is math with physics, programming is the virtual aspect of it. it's 'applied math'. I understand enough discmath because I studied enough of it both in college, and high school (since I was math/physics elective) so I have managed to understand some very rough and old papers.

You can always self-study if you haven't got the time. Here's a book which is kind of a meme, but it's still very good: https://fuuu.be/polytech/INFOF408/Introduction-To-The-Theory-Of-Computation-Michael-Sipser.pdf

This is the 2nd edition though, 3rd is out --- I think 4th is coming. The best goddamn book, regardless of its meme status.

I remember that from ages ago. It was very, very cringe-worthy. I think it's the fault of whatever shit bootcamp he attended to learn his 'craft' for using imperative languages to teach DSA, if they taught him DSA at all? That is why in real universities they mostly teach DSA with functional languages. I studied 'programming' (not CS, 'programming') in a college which by American standards would be considered 'junior', for 3 semesters, and they, too, did not touch on functional languages. It was not until I had dropped out that I learned how to do FP using SML, Ocaml, Haskell, Scheme etc. That was when I 'understood' DSA for real.

Truly, this person is an embarrassment. I am currently working on an implementation of Appel et al's ASDL (github.com/Chubek/ZephyrASDL, check the new_version branch!) and it now emits decent C code, so it is time to write the man page (it currently has a sucky one) and the TextInfo. I COULD potentially have ChatGPT make both, it is very decent at doing so. But see, I am not a moron. So I use write them in Markdown and have Pandoc make the final markups.

Truth is, if you know your tools, if you know how to use a DSL-driven approach to programming, you won't need to use AI to generate your code. You don't need to go to Harvard to know DSA, neither a junior college like mine. Just grab CSLR and read it on your spare time!

I think this person is the guy behind Homebrew. I don't know why he thought Homebrew is an accomplishment that would give him immunity from knowing basic DSA --- which in real world, is what programming is about. Package managers have existed since the dawn of time. Linux has like dozens of package managers. His package manager being 'unique' on MacOS does not mean it's an accomplishment, it means MacOS sucks cocks!

Basically, when you start a project, think: can I turn this project into a paper? If you can't, then it's worthless. He could have just strapped Pacman to be built on MacOS and called it a day!

These days, employers are looking for people with theoretical, constitutional knowledge. Any monkey can code. I let ChatGPT aid me with a lot of my C code, it's very decent at generating C. Like I need a Makefile, it makes it for me. I need a print help function, it makes it for me. There's nothing wrong with using AI to 'help' you, but don't use it in vital shit!

But, if the code that AI generates is as good as the vital backbones of your software, maybe save up some money and go to college if you haven't, a 2-year degree at a junior college will be good. I am going back to college next year and I am 31! There's nothing wrong with being an old student.

Just don't expect people to suck your dick when you don't know how recursion works!

Good point me lad. The plain-text based approach indeed makes scraping much easier. And plus, if we send a 'process', the process can be easily malicious, even if we don't elavate its access.

Like imagine today. I tell you to wget a shell script and pipe it to shell to install my software from my remote (FPT, Git etc). This almost always needs sudo. I can't imagine how many 12 year olds would be fooled to sudo rm -rf *?

That is provided that a 12 year old would even know how to do that. I know several people who began their UNIX journey when they were as young as 7~8, but there's a reason these people earn 500k a year when they are 30! I can't imagine if your normie aunt would really feel like using a UNIX pipeline to check her emails.

HTTP 'just werks'. Derpcat told me this in 2010 when I told her I hate HTTP in 2010. IT JUST WERKS. Kay's solution, although extreemly unbaked, would not allow my mom to read her Intagram feed.

Besides money, the computation cost is also high. Kay used to use mini-computers, us poor people used micros (if i were a poor person when mini/micro distinction existed, today it's just clusters vs Jimmy's gaming rig, oh, where art thou, DEC?)

But again, nobody has given a it a thought. THAT IS THE ISSUE. Academic text on alternatives to web, AFAIK, is rare. Part of it is the 'just werks' thing, but also, academia just does not care about web.

I think if people who are smarter than me would give this a 'thorough' thought, they will come up with a good solution. Web won because it was 'open', it was easy to navigiate, as opposed to pesky newsgroups and the such. You can still go to the first website to see this: http://info.cern.ch/ (browse this with Lynx or W3M, it's the best way to do it! Don't use FF or Chrome).

I dunno!