Encephalotrocity @ Cephalotrocity @biglemmowski.win

Is this thing on?

---

Read more

Posts

66

Comments

1,209

Joined

12 mo. ago

It's not all the algo though as all it does is cater to what the masses 'want'. Look at Lemmy. No algorithm, yet it is just as partisan or worse than any other social media platform out there. It's just curated by people instead of code.

Before FB or Twitter, all forms of internet communication (forums, BBS, newsgroups, 4chan, etc...) were just as bad. The news just didn't pile on to the steady stream of BS at that time. IMO capitalism is killing unbiased media and letting blatantly biased media flourish (ie: FOX) because that is what the masses want.

Source: 'wish' TV

lol

also, it is the most distant point on the surface of the Earth

I'm having a difficult time reconciling this with the fact the Earth is an oblate spheroid. I feel like there is a small semicircle on the 'far' side where the distance is marginally farther due to the wider vs tall dimensions.

Anybody think this idiot learned the lesson to not feed trash pandas? Anyone?

The only way to stop 50-100 bad raccoons that run into your yard is 50-100 good raccoons with guns

Here you go!

I'll make my own determination tyvm. And as already stated, I agree with their analysis. Find a less biased source.

An even better headline would be: US sanctions finally convince Hamas to release the hostages and surrender.

Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

Analysis / Bias

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor mainly focuses on human rights violations, especially in conflict zones like Gaza. The organization’s articles often use emotionally loaded language. Headlines like “Int’l committee must investigate Israel’s holding of dead bodies in Gaza​” exemplify this. The cited sources, such as NPR, are often credible but can lean towards perspectives emphasizing violations by certain state actors, potentially omitting broader contextual details, which could lead to a one-sided view of the situation. This selection of stories and framing indicates a significant bias against actions taken by Israel.

I'm guessing Audio, but no clue.

Not as sad as what 42k dead? Keep on defending violence with violence though. Definitely not sad.

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor

Yes, I am. Didn't get a paragraph in when these criticisms became obvious to me before I even checked. OFC I disregard the report. It is biased af.

The question was rhetorical. But no, I'm not reading your clearly biased copypasta.

Clearly, more violence is what will fix this. /s

Be sure to let me know when an #-page report is released and/or casualty projections are large enough that the price-tag isn't worth it. Otherwise you're using violence to justify violence and this cycle of death continues... to whose benefit again?

Although the federal government cannot require private companies to observe holidays

JFC what a dystopian hellhole. It kills me they are so proud of their shitty living conditions.

There there. I was only kidding. Everybody knows violence results in the weak winning and the strong crying about it. 🙄

That's what happens when you resort to violence. The strong win and the weak cry about injustice. Maybe next time they'll not bombard Israel with rockets if the price tag is too high.

I don't know how to speak russian so I'll pass thanks.

Of course not. Republicans would still have a month or so to rile up another rebellion.