Encephalotrocity @ Cephalotrocity @biglemmowski.win

Is this thing on?

---

Read more

Posts

66

Comments

1,209

Joined

12 mo. ago

This has been bugging me of late so I'll ask here even though FTR I hate that I agree with Trump:

Why don't we just split the difference and offset by 30 min for the whole year/permanently?

They might be able to prove in court he's guilty. Convicting is a different story.

They have a rule against changing the article title in the post. That's probably what the actual violation was.

No idea why they said it was astroturfing.

Liable

A satirical Enron, so was the pie a planned part of the art or was it a legit attack by someone not in on the joke?

Psychology defines it in terms of cultural norms and whether it is distressful or harmful for the individual. Are you exhibiting behaviour outside of what your society deems normal? Sanity will be suspect. Does your behaviour bother you, seems to be outside your control, or is harming the quality of your life? Probably can be diagnosed as some psychiatric malady of one sort or another.

The example I recall in class is a culture in which witches talk to spirits. Witch comes in alarmed that they are talking to spirits all the time and can't stop. Psychiatrist asks 'is that not your job?' and they reply "yes, but I'm talking to the wrong spirits".

If your question was how to use a metaphor to describe sanity, anything that represents stability is common ("even when the shit hits the fan she is solid as a rock").

It's definitely a weakness. There is an entire spectrum of personal beliefs, but wherever you are, if yours don't align with the mods you get censored. Reality is every new users first week is finding out where they 'belong' and this both discourages new users, and creates detrimental echo chambers.

I don't have a reddit account so I can't verify, but IIRC it doesn't ignore single return commands, and for certain Discord pushes the message immediately on hitting enter. This is closer to what most modern interfaces use, and what anyone using SMS is used to. Shift+enter allows the user to force a new line and 2x gives the paragraph break.

I'm not saying markdown isn't a thing, but it isn't used nearly as often (edit: as in Lemmy's particular implementation) as being described and setting up Lemmy's interface to require it feels clunky. My specific issue is the handling of 1 enter being ignored. Everything else makes sense because I too use markdown manually quite often.

Don't even cut it off, just add a 3000% tariff. Don't forget the 'Douchebag tolerance' fee.

While I am not old enough to have experience with typing in the 70s, in my decades of experience with text input methods I cannot ever recall one using this method of 1 carriage return being ignored. No forum, email or word processor (even WordPerfect for the c64) or Notepad uses this, so my guess is your experience is in some niche technical field which does not apply to what the general population expects.

Most UIs don't even have a preview option, let alone need one, because they don't require you to have a stick up your ass to 'get' using them.

The Lemmy UI is easy enough to use IMO. Where the problems show up are:

• Unreliable linking to other comments and posts. It is annoying to no end to receive a link to someone's comment and be unceremoniously ripped out of your home server and put onto the federated one no longer logged in etc... This behaviour should somehow be prevented
• a quick reference to the text commands easily found somewhere (ie: sidebar)
• I'd prefer more theme and colour options
• Fix the text interface so it respects carriage return entries properly. If I want to start a new line directly under the current one (edit: AFI knew after 4+ months of use) there is

no way

to do

it.

Make it so a single carriage return is acknowledged and correctly starts a new line right underneath, or automatically forces a blank line between. This needing double entry is unintuitive and wrecks many new user's first hundred post's appearance.

Finally, the premise: Lemmy.world should be more welcoming is itself undesirable. That instance is already taking up an inordinate number of users so IMO every other instance (except the awful ones, we all know who they are) should be using a better UI, not L.W

Edit: Here is one of the better inferences of what happened before the BB and even it boils down to a spec of energy to get the whole thing started.

"Study". Even his best guess is that the singularity self-perpetuated until its stability gave out for unknown reason. Again, one dude, no supporting evidence, coming up with ideas because science is rigorous. Is his idea the consensus? No. Does it even address before the singularity itself existed? No. Why? because there is nothing to go on.

You are literally talking about something the Bible is as relevant an authority on as anyone else. That is why scientists don't bother with it because it is meaningless to do so.

By consensus, I'm referring to the fact that scientists, when asked, say "the universe started ~14bya". Any attempt to discuss earlier than that is wild conjecture so the only responsible way to deal with it is to accept that it is currently unknowable. Fact is we already see 'something from nothing' constantly. This phenomenon is readily proven. For example, spontaneous generation of quantum particle pairs are well established so the aforementioned conjecture is an attempt to be rigorous, but not an invalidation of consensus.

What is more dangerous for 'people that infer knowledge from authoritative language' is to believe that 'consensus = matter settled, the end'. Nothing in science is absolute except, perhaps, the mathematical fundamentals. Are there still concepts or proposals that will get you laughed at by respectable scientists? Of course. That is what is meant by 'consensus' when it comes to Science.

No, you're confusing testability with reasonable interpretation via interpolation of data. I did simplify to answer the OP's question. Prior to the Big Bang we can't know what 'exactly' was going on, but at that point, by definition, Time and Entropy begins. It's like arguing absolute zero doesn't have consensus because it is physically impossible to attain that temperature, or that there are actually distances smaller than the Planck length.

The salient point is that Something HAS to exist because the opposite is literal meaninglessness and that has scientific consensus.

As much consensus as there can be. The BB is defined as being the event that brought everything into existence and so there's no point in debating something that cannot be tested.

Because when there's nothing there is literally no meaning. Prior to the Big Bang there was no Entropy, no Time, no Matter or Energy. You cannot really discuss what happened then because it would be nonsense. You can't even ask 'how long before the BB did the nothing exist?' because there was no time, so the answer is like dividing by zero. The BB brought all that into existence so by necessity anything must exist for your question to even have meaning.

To answer your question more directly: because nature abhors a vacuum (even though there was no vacuum before the BB because that would have been a 'something').

You aren't a CEO though.

You gotta be kitten me

I still use Hotmail because I have a billion accounts linked to it and can't be arsed to change the address.