Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CE
Posts
0
Comments
462
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • I can backup an entire VM snapshot very quickly and then restore it in a matter of minutes. Everything from the system files, database, Jellyfin version and configs, etc. All easily backed up and restored in an easy to manage bundle.

    A container is not as easy to manage in the same way.

  • So what's going to happen is there will be a group that will exploit all the horribly insecure home routers out there with active CVEs that will never get patched. They will then use systems within those networks to do the torrenting, and then securely copy them away.

    Then a ton of people will be accused of piracy just by their IPs and get disconnected.

    I'm sure it'll be fine...

  • I'm not wrong. There's mountains of research demonstrating that LLMs encode contextual relationships between words during training.

    There's so much more happening beyond "predicting the next word". This is one of those unfortunate "dumbing down the science communication" things. It was said once and now it's just repeated non-stop.

    If you really want a better understanding, watch this video:

    https://youtu.be/UKcWu1l_UNw

    And before your next response starts with "but Apple..."

    Their paper has had many holes poked into it already. Also, it's not a coincidence their paper released just before their WWDC event which had almost zero AI stuff in it. They flopped so hard on AI that they even have class action lawsuits against them for their false advertising. In fact, it turns out that a lot of their AI demos from last year were completely fabricated and didn't exist as a product when they announced them. Even some top Apple people only learned of those features during the announcements.

    Apple's paper on LLMs is completely biased in their favour.

  • This is corporate AI against open source AI.

    Show me where I can download Midjourneys full model to run it locally and then we can agree to call it "open weights". Unless their base model and training data is also available, it's not open source.

  • It’s a tech illiterate YouTuber for tech illiterate people that think they are tech literate

    That's a great way to say it. I usually just call him a "tech entertainer" that real tech people look down on. But I like your version.

    The video that really polarized my opinion on them was their "storage server upgrade" video where they worked on replacing their horribly and amateurishly configured storage server.

    Wendell from Lvl1 and Allan Jude (maintainer for OpenZFS) commented on LTT's setup and, while they didn't outright say anything negative, they didn't have anything good to say and their tone heavily implied they thought LTT are posers.