phon
Carrot @ Carrot @lemmy.today Posts 0Comments 106Joined 2 yr. ago
The one time I used lua was to make a casino in Minecraft with the ComputerCraft mod like, over a decade ago. I enjoyed it. Even as a young lad I didn't like index from 1, though
I agree that societally we should get over it, but it doesn't change the fact that it's an awkward activity on a first date
This. The who point is to cram more seats than they are currently able
While I understand the sentiment, if they switch to SteamOS as a primary focus, what's the problem with buying someone else's handheld that's built to run SteamOS? There are already handhelds more performant than the Steam Deck out there, once they have official SteamOS support what's the difference? Don't get me wrong, I've actually bought an absurd number of Steam Decks so far for myself and for friends/family, but once they die, if there's no Steam Deck 2, I'll probably just pick up a handheld that is built specifically to run SteamOS
I'm all for all-gender bathrooms, but there MUST be at least two public bathrooms at any given spot. I can't tell you how uncomfortable it is to take a first date to a museum, both need to use the bathroom, and walk into the single, silent, all-gender bathroom, and try to pretend you can't hear each other doing your business. I assume gay folks have been struggling with this since the beginning, but y'all should have said something
Right but just because you personally didn't like it doesn't mean it isn't a good comedy. I understand that you are now saying it's not something you personally care for, but your original comment was stating that it being bad was objectively true. Like, I can say that I think The Simpsons is a bad comedy, and I could provide a bunch of data to back it up but I can't say that The Simpsons is a bad comedy, because how did it get to 36 seasons in counting if people weren't enjoying it?
I pay for the streaming services, but don't stream. Maybe this is me trying to justify "theft", but how I like to think about it is this: I pay for the streaming services. I have the technical know-how to either download directly or rip (screen record) any shows I want from any of the popular services, as well as to write the scripts myself to roughly automate this. I also have spare computers to do this 24/7. However, it's actually better for the streaming service that I don't do this myself, since they still get my money without me using the bandwidth. I pay for AMC Stubs A-list but don't often see the movies in theaters, so I don't feel bad pirating new releases. As for movies/shows not on streaming services, I could buy used dvd/blurays, rip them myself, then sell them back, but that would ultimately result in a near-net-zero cost anyway, so what's the point of going through all that? In my mind, as long as I'm paying for these subscriptions pirating feels like it's no longer an ethical/moral gray area.
Note that I only do this because I can afford to. When I was younger, I would pirate everything without worrying because if I couldn't afford to pay the streaming service, they didn't lose a potential customer if I pirated anyway. Now that I am better off and would definitely be paying for these subscriptions, I might as well, but still get to own the content I'm paying for. 120TB and counting!
For those with preexisting lifetime memberships, things haven't changed yet (outside of basically trying to make Plex a social media thing), but in my eyes it's only a matter of time. Made the switch to Jellyfin this week after having used Plex for 5 years. If I wanted to invite new users to join my server, they'd have to pay $2 a month to be able to watch on their phone instead of the one-time payment of $5.
I've always had to manually add my GPU to system monitor, and since I've always had integrated GPU as well, had to sort out which GPU is the dedicated GPU before knowing what service is using which GPU. But this definitely is my favorite method once I get it all set up, makes it really clear if a steam game is using the wrong GPU
Same, solid black on my PC, rocking the default wallpaper on my phone. Interestingly, when I switched to using graphineOS, the default background is solid black, so I have that on my phone now as well, too. I prefer it for the less visual distraction, and the fact that on pled screens it saves battery
Still can brother 🏴☠️
Been on Plex for years, I will be fully migrated to Jellyfin by the end of the week
I mean, he's a retired guy with new hobby, it wouldn't seem too out of the question that he spent a good chunk of time following tutorials for things that have plenty of tutorials out there.
I grew up a windows user, as was my father before me. I first started with Linux in my teens, initially on Raspbian as I was gifted a raspberry pi 2b with a camera, and I wanted to try goofing around with python and computer vision (which was the style at the time.) Once I entered university, I dual booted Windows 7 and Linux Mint, since my professor suggested moving to Linux for C++ homework to make things simpler. I was scared of jumping to a new desktop OS due to my upbringing, so I couldn't abandon Windows, not yet anyway. Following that I had a cheap Summer fling with Kali as it was a requirement for a cyber security course I took. This replaced my Mint install. After college I got into self-hosting, and my server ran Debian for stability (and still does to this day), however I was still scared of leaving the safety of my littlr Windows garden I called home. But then Windows betrayed me by putting ads on my taskbar, and I got fed up. I installed EndeavorOS on my main machine which was a laptop. I immediately fell head over heels for the AUR, and not needing a deep understanding of linux during the install was a plus. I got comfy with the ins and outs of linux over the next year and a half or so, and when I finally went to build myself a new desktop PC, I made the switch to Arch. It's been great, and I felt like I understood all the decisions I made during the install. That was 6 months ago. If Arch ever fails me catastrophically,(which would be pretty hard as I am using an os snapshot manager, and backing those snapshots up to my server) I will move to either Debian or Mint for stability, as I am kind of tired of hopping around at this point.
Permanently Deleted
If it runs on a computer, it's literally "just logic and RNG". It's all transistors, memory, and an RNG.
Sure, but this is a bad faith argument. You can say this about anything. Everything is made up of other stuff, it's what someone has done to combine or use those elements that matters. You could extend this to anything proprietary. Manufacturing equipment is just a handful of metals, rubbers, and plastics. However, the context in which someone uses those materials is what matters when determining if copyright laws have been broken.
The data used to train an AI model is copyrighted. It's impossible for something to exist without copyright (in the past 100 years). Even public domain works had copyright at some point.
If the data used to train the model was copyrighted data acquired without explicit permission from the data owners, it itself cannot be copyrighted. You can't take something copyrighted by someone else, put it in a group of stuff that is also copyrighted by others, and claim you have some form of ownership over that collection of works.
This is not correct. Every artist ever has been trained with copyrighted works, yet they don't have to recite every single picture they've seen or book they've ever read whenever they produce something.
You speak confidently, but I don't think you understand the problem area enough to act as an authority on the topic.
Laws can be different for individuals and companies. Hell, laws of use can be different for two different individuals, and the copyright owner actually gets a say in how their thing can be used by different groups of people. For instance, for a 3d art software, students can use it for free. However, their use agreement is that they cannot profit off of anything they make. Non students have to pay, but can sell their work without consequences. Companies have to pay even more, but often times get bulk discounts if they are buying licenses for their whole team.
Artists have something of value: AI training data. We know this is valuable to AI training companies, because artists are getting reached out to by AI companies, asking to sell them the rights to train their model on their data. If AI companies just use an artist's AI training data without their permission, it's stealing the potential revenue they could have made selling it to a different AI company. Taking away revenue potential on someone's work is the basis for having violated copyright/fair use laws.
Nintendo games are excellent games. Some of the highest quality games among AAA studios. What sucks is Nintendo as a company
I've seen so many of these I have gained the ability to read them straight on. In this case it doesn't matter, but I always feel like I've got one over the meme creator when it says something like "You look dumb holding your phone like that"
Permanently Deleted
I think your understanding of generative AI is incorrect. It's not just "logic and RNG" It is using training data (read as both copyrighted and uncopyrighted material) to come up with a model of "correctness" or "expectedness". If you then give it a pattern, (read as question or prompt) it checks its "expectedness" model for whatever should come next. If you ask it "how many cups in a pint" it will check the most common thing it has seen after that exact string of words it in its training data: 2. If you ask for a picture of something "in the style of van gogh", it will spit out something with thick paint and swirls, as those are the characteristics of the pictures in its training data that have been tagged with "Van Gogh". These responses are not brand new, they are merely a representation of the training data that would most work as a response to your request. In this case, if any of the training data is copyrighted, then attribution must be given, or at the very least permission to use this data must be given by the current copyright holder.
This but unironically