CaptainSpaceman @ CaptainSpaceman @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

1,160

Joined

2 yr. ago

Re-read my original comment

You mean like putting a divider between urinals? Because that already exists as an option.

Sometimes, and even then its usually paltry as an actual intrusion-prevention-device> The funniest is when there is a mirror directly across from the urinals, dividers dont do shit then lol

Trans men generally use a stall anyway, what with usually lacking what they need in order to use a urinal.

I know OP is about trans, but Ive not mentioned anything regardging cis/trans because imo it doesnt matter. everyone should have the same right to privacy in a bathroom, therefore gender neutral bathrooms make a lot of sense.

And plenty of cis men also sit down in a stall if they need to urinate.

True! But there are inherently less stalls in a mens room BECAUSE of the urinals.

So men do have that privacy. Even trans men. The problem here is that you don’t think trans men are men.

Again, this has nothing to do with trans, youre shoving that into my comments.

Im kinda making the same point, but moreso that modern wealthy elites trade in wage slaves today and still have highly unethical practices, and its those exact practices that give them their wealth and power.

Ethical people dont tend to climb the societal ladder

Why shouldnt men be afforded the same privacy as women?

I called it unethical and said it doesnt excuse anything

Because boys/mens rooms dont get just stalls, they have to stand side by side and pee in a trough sometimes, privacy is forbidden

IMO just make all bathrooms gender neutral and put stalls in all mens rooms

You in Paris rn? Cuz your gymnastics are amazing

Why are you still asking this question at this point?

Because the question in the headline is the propaganda meant to make people doubt the answer

TBF he said hed be a dictator only until things are fixed. And im SUUUURE he will give up his power with ease

Thats never the ONLY option, its just that the biggest winners in capitalism also make the rules, so they choose to always be the winners

There are other options of course, but those require the proles choosing something besides escapism.

Thats always been there because the ads are baked in the shows too.

Reminder that even black people owned slaves because it was the way to wealth during the time period.

Reminder that almost all pirates traded in slaves as well after they captured them from merchant ships.

Please understand, im not condoning slavery or the unethical actions of a president. Merely that it was a sign of the times much like the elite business owners of the world who trade in wage slaves today.

The path to wealth (read:power) always goes through the workers.

Not to mention this interaction happened ON MOTHERS DAY

You say you dont get it, butvthr answer is simple: undereducated and willfully ignorant

The Eloi will still require a handful of Morlocks to oversee the drone workers

The?

His long time cohost is a groomer

This came out before the Kris news, my guess is to add to his "look how perfect I am" persona since it was tarnished by this former employee.

Dude is almost certainly a kiddy diddler too

Suggesting examples are not the same as explaining

But the interviewee didnt suggest an example, they merely attempted to create a deadlock.

However, in their attempt to do so they imply that they CAN explain a deadlock and therefore should get the job.

The interviewer doesnt ask for an explanation, only if the interviewee is able to provide one.

They absolutely do, anything bad that happens will happen under HER watch and they can smear the shit out of her for it.

This is what I underestimated with Harris' campaign, is that shes a relative unknown outside of her DA work so they dont have much to bash her on except "shes black! Zomg!!!!!!"