Unless you're in Europe that's even more sex-touristy than Thailand. Nobody crosses continents for windmills, but lots of people like Buddhist architecture, beaches and sticky rice.
It's regulated prostitution in the Netherlands, at least, and sex work is work.
I've never had a guy tell me that exactly, but I've definitely encountered people (drunk people? I feel like I'm remembering a drunk guy going on about it) who have mentioned regularly going to Thailand and who make me wonder.
So wait, does this apply in both directions? It seems kind of impossible that people from city A are ruining city B and people from city B are also ruining city A.
Thailand or the Philippines is actually the right answer, although it heavily depends on maleness and general vibes. If it's a women I'd just think "have fun eating street curry".
Dubai consistently knocks them down a couple pegs of respect.
I'll submit Israel. Unless it's to visit family there's no wholesome reason to insert yourself there at the moment.
This is a textbook use-case for crypto. And honestly, you can fundraise for a lot of things through those conventional channels right now anyway; freedom of association is still strong in the West.
The trick is always getting people to send you money in the first place.
In quantum mechanics, there are times you divide two different complex numbers, and complex multiplication/division is the thing two real numbers can't really replicate. That's how the Bloch 2-sphere in 3D space is constructed from two complex dimensions (which maps to 4 real ones).
It's peripheral, though. Nothing in the guts of the theory needs it AFAIK - the Bloch sphere doesn't generalise much and is more of a visualisation. So, jury's still out on if it's us or if it's nature that likes seeing it that way.
Would that make it less true? Complex numbers can be seen as a weird subgroup of the 2x2 real matrices. (And you can "stack" the two representations to get 4x4 real quaternions)
Furthermore, octonions are non-associative, and so can't be a subgroup of anything (although you can do a similar thing using an alternate matrix multiplication rule). They still show up in a lot of the same pure math contexts, though.
Yeah, OP has since clarified they meant that more literally than I expected.