Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CD
Posts
11
Comments
169
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Mine is similar. Arrived, day one in a new team; this one was more high-intensity than the usual - a fast-paced and very hands-on work environment. Noticed the team leader was working in a dysfunctional and unsafe manner; seemed unsteady. As the most junior member and a newbie at that I hesitated to confront directly; thankfully I managed to find a more experienced colleague. Scene was made safe; turned out the guy was drunk as a skunk. Canned within the hour.

    I’ve since learned to be stronger and more willing to confront suboptimal or dangerous performance in team members, regardless of their seniority.

    That was pretty scary.

  • The last and only printer that I bought from HP worked well and didn’t pull any shenanigans, it was a Laserjet 5L.

    Since then, feedback from colleagues and what I’ve seen from reviews and tech communities put me off buying HP again. Between their cloud printing, their inkjet cartridge verification and the USB ports covered in stickers and now this…

  • Cory Doctorow (pluralistic.net) has a number of stories now on the concept of “enshittification”. Basically businesses start off being good to customers but eventually get to a point where, if they’re dominant the drive for endless profit results in them turning to squeezing suppliers, customers, everyone.

    Tech enables new forms of exploitation.

  • Either something is happening acutely, or there’s something atypical / different about your setup.

    The feature has been present for a long time and multiple instances use it. If it failed regularly, the amount of complaints we would see here and on other instances, and the headache the dev and admin teams would have on the back of all the support tickets, would be inescapable.

  • From what I can see, the fact that individual doctors can see their pay go up as they progress and gain experience isn’t in dispute.

    The fact that individual doctors can get paid for doing extended or additional hours isn’t in dispute.

    The issue is that freezing pay and awarding sequential sub-inflationary pay rises has effectively cut pay for individual roles.

    Is someone one year out of medial school in 2023 worth a third less than someone one year out of medial school in 2008?

    Ditto the registrar. Ditto the consultant. Ditto many others in the public sector.

    That’s the point of dispute here.

    And pay review bodies are appointed by the government and work within whatever constraints the treasury has already placed on the budget - and that have also been ignored in the past. Hiding behind the pay review bodies isn’t going to work.

    The sooner they come up with a sensible pay package - multiyear deal is going to be needed - the better.

  • There is some variation across disciplines; I do think that in general the process does catch a lot of frank rubbish (and discourages submission of obvious rubbish), but from time to time I do come across inherently flawed work in so-called “high impact factor” and allegedly “prestigious” journals.

    In the end, even after peer review, you need to have a good understanding of the field and to have developed and applied your critical appraisal skills.

  • Aneurysms are not related to neurones. They’re bulges in the walls of blood vessels related to structural weakness. They can affect vessels that supply the brain and if they burst it can be catastrophic and rapidly fatal - is this what you were thinking of?

    Wikipedia link for proper definitions and examples here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aneurysm