Bronzebeard @ Bronzebeard @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

570

Joined

8 mo. ago

This question was about NATIVE LINUX ONLY games. Not just supporting it...

It's still an argument, given that this historically wasn't the case. And Mac used to have a bigger share of the pie. Do they even make Mac only games anymore?

But those numbers pretty much prove my point. Unless you're already set up to be making games specific to a system, there's no point in starting from scratch to only name something for 1-2% of the market.

If the least used operating system. Why limit your audience to such a small niche to begin with? Game development isn't cheap. You tend to not want to lock out your chances of recouping that by blocking 90% of potential players

Hyperlink which went to a different article. Do you not understand how the Internet works? Don't act like you weren't wrong when you failed to clarify properly. That's not on me

So...not in the article, but in a completely different linked article. Got it

The word laser does not appear once in this article.

Where's it say they used a laser to transfer the information? This sounded like quantum entanglement was being demonstrated here

Please explain how you came to that conclusion after reading their comment. Holy shit.

You keep acting like votes mean permission to break the law. Our that people who generally don't pay attention to politics would be fine with someone they didn't vote for it against breaking the law. This is a dipshit logical stance to take. So pretending you're not the store one here when you try to say idiotic shit like this. Like did you think this through in your head?

Yes, I keep bringing it up because you boot lickers love to ignore the context of everything you argue about. Abstraction is the only chance you have at winning an argument against such an obviously one sided discussion.

I shouldn't be surprised by your lack of reading comprehension. I'm not really sure what you're even responding to, none of it lines up with anything I just said.

And again, telling you he's going to break the law doesn't mean he's allowed to break the law even if he is voted in after saying it.

This is that half of America is functionally illiterate nonsense the rest of us have to deal with.

Getting voted in is NOT permission to break the law.

He's illegally bypassing Congress with his actions. Doesn't matter if this is what your dumbass voted for, it's not how this works.

Except those laws have not yet been made. So it still remains not illegal.

If you're going to be pedantic, at least be right.

Given that he campaigned claiming he wouldn't be enacting Project 2025 (even though it was obvious he would be), I don't think you can claim people not voting are automatically okay with him breaking that very explicit promise.

No. Americans do not want this. Americans especially didn't want it done by some nutjob private citizen who has zero authority to do what he's doing, and no oversight.

It means he doesn't have the popular mandate they keep claiming they do.

But yes. Half of adults are functionally illiterate. 5th-6th grade reading levels. They can physically read the words, but will only grasp the most basic surface level meaning. Republicans' started attacking education decades ago. This is what they wrought.

I have over a hundred tabs on my phone. It just shows :) in the counter box now

That's not the final count

No. He got a plurality of the votes. Not a majority.

The majority of participating voters voted against him.

How many times do you need that repeated to understand?

also flew the Union Jack inverted

How could they tell?

The majority did not vote for this. The majority of voters didn't even vote for this. He only won a plurality (<50%)

Their communications would still be publicly owned under that act.