Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BR
Posts
0
Comments
570
Joined
8 mo. ago

  • It's not the skills they're looking for when they're hiring h1bs in tech. It's the ability to underpay due to the threat of deportation without their sponsorship as an employer that they want.

    You can get the skills here. But you have to pay for them. These greedy shits don't want to do that.

  • and basically no real use outside of generating misinformation and stealing from artists

    This shows you think all AI are LLMs or generative art. Those are only the most visible faces of the tech, and you're showing your name ignorance of the field.

  • I was pretty surprised by the barrenness of my wishlist. There's been shockingly few titles I've been that excited about. Almost nothing in the AAA realm. And the few things that I am waiting to come out have been on that list for several years already...

  • This is the dumb kind of "best do nothing, because both no is perfect" approach to making sure no disincentives are ever taken because someone somewhere else might also try to do the illegal thing that they'll lose access to the moment they're caught...

  • I never suggested destroying the technology that is "AI". I'm not uncomfortable about AI, I've even considered pivoting my career in that direction.

    I suggested destroying the particular implementation that was trained on the illegitimate data. If someone can recreate it using legitimate data, GREAT. That's what we want to happen. The tool isn't the problem. It's the method they're using to train them.

    Please don't make up random ass narratives I never even hunted at, and then argue against them.

  • That's stupid. The damage is still done to the owner of that data used illegally. Make them destroy it.

    But when you levy such miniscule fines that are less than they stand to make from it, it's just a cost of business. Fines can work if they were appropriate to the value derived.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Most AI are not built to answer questions. They're designed to act as some kind of detection/filter heuristic to identify specific things about an input that leads to a desired output.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It wouldn't be. It would still work. It just wouldn't be exclusively available to the group that created it-any competitive advantage is lost.

    But all of this ignores the real issue - you're not really punishing the use of unauthorized data. Those who owned that data are still harmed by this.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Making it open source doesn't change how it works. It doesn't need the data after it's been trained. Most of these AIs are just figuring out patterns to look for in the new data it comes across.