Because training an AI is similar to training a person. You give it a bunch of examples to learn the rules from, then it applies what it learned to the prompt it is asked. The training data is not included in the end result.
It's probably that people familiar with the technicals of AI don't automatically assume it's LLMs being talked about. There's several other types being out to very good use, especially in the sciences right now.
Even LLMs have their place as interpretors for those other types. Having natural language interpretation that is fairly accurate the vast majority of the time is a powerful tool with a lot of applications. Near Real time translation or closed captioning is great for accessibility.
I don't understand the hype around it. Played it briefly, but found it clunky feeling. Characters are so big, they had to tone down their speed, so everything feelings sluggish. And the abilities just feel mostly useless.
But it's F2P, why bother being patient with a game you don't have to pay to try out?
You're commenting on an article about how he tried to stop the covid vaccine in the midst of the pandemic that killed over a million Americans. He is exactly that tone deaf
The creators themselves are saying this so I would assume they’ve got some basis for it
Yes, their basis is they wrote a shitty show, hoping the diversity would make up for their bad writing, and decided to blame the diversity for it instead of their own failures.
He's trying to steal our rights, his petty bullshit is just distraction