Yeah but if anything doesn't work correctly it's specifically because of the Chromium monopoly on the direction of web development. It's almost a reason unto itself to move to Firefox. It's like saying "what's the point in shopping at a mom and pop store when Amazon basically won the future of capitalism anyway?" As an argument it's just "let's give up and let Google win."
Then I mean a later year because my girlfriend and I each own X1s from around that time which we bought on eBay. Mine, I believe, was listed as a 2018. Hers is a year newer. So those figures might need budged but I do not mean a T480.
Unless you're just recommending a T480 over an X1, in which case, I apologize for stepping all over your punchline.
Safety razor user; I change every one to two shaves. If I start on that second use and it's too rough for the shave I've got in mind (mostly a problem for my neck) then I'll toss it.
Leaving carts outside the corrals at the store. Failing to signal. Actually a lot of car or car adjacent behaviors. All of which go back to "my immediate convenience is more important than being a conscientious member of the society I live in with other people."
'Female', when it's used in a non-clinical or technical context to describe a human woman. Everyone has a slip here or there, right, so, broad stroke take incoming, but, generally speaking, I've never met or talked with anyone who reliably refers to women as 'females' who actually respects them. It's a word you'd use to refer to a complete person only if you see them first and foremost as some kind of specimen, and it reaks to me of poor socialization, unhealthy relationship with that sex, or simply low class.
It's already saved me from accidentally tapping a recent or favorite number because they hang up a split second faster than my thumb lands on the end button. I approve of this change.
Objectivity in reporting is a nice goal when you're trying to write objective journalism. But this dude clearly wrote an opinion piece. It literally says "you shouldn't" in the headline. That sort of thing can't be objective, and it would look embarrassing if it tried. Objectivity for objectivity's sake regardless of context is not really sensible. What you're asking for is a fact sheet, not something written by a person because that person believes a thing.
That being said, I'll give it to you: it wasn't an especially good op-ed piece. It would've been better if he elaborated some of the stuff he said. But that just means he's got some work to do as a writer, not that his crime was 'not being objective enough'.
Only an aspiring Trekkie over here. Can you explain this line? I don't follow.