Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BR
Posts
0
Comments
316
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Their arguments are ridiculous. The state executed its right to select their electors. Congress has the power to remove the disability if supported by 2/3rds.

    They are arguing that since they didn't impose the disability that the State overstepped their rights. This is not how the 14th was written.

  • The first half of the sentence you quoted was also fairly important to the overall message.

    You're point is still important though, but more information is needed to really evaluate the situation. If the district naturally has more repubs, then this is a big win by dems. If there are fewer repubs, then this was a disappointing victory.

  • I think they plan to offer a gaming service (eg Game Pass) that will not be dependent on a platform. I'm sure their IP will have exclusives or timed exclusives on that service.

    We will probably see another Xbox. But I'm not sure if we'll see 2 more. Same goes for Playstation. There will certainly be a ps6, but will there be a ps7?

  • There are lots of them, especially in the last 10 years. A few more if you include Scalia's tenure. The most recent of them is the "major question doctrine". This idea, invented by the current court, allows the court to change any law whenever the court decides that they don't like the current law and they think it's important enough. There is no justification in the constitution or in prior case law for such a power to be granted to the court.

  • I was editing my prior comment while you were writing this. Please see the updated version.

    I think you've misunderstood the link you provided. Part of the militia is explicitly not regulated because the civilian population is not part of the National Guard.

  • Please stop leaving out the important parts. Clarifying components of a law are very important. Your link clearly states that there are 2 classes of the militia and the 2nd class is unorganized and therefore not part of the "well regulated militia". The unorganized militia is everyone not in the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

    Additionally, by your interpretation, anyone over the age of 45 would not be a part of the militia and would therefore not have a right to bear arms. Including Heller who would therefore have lacked standing. Would you agree? If you do not, please explain.

  • The 2nd amendment states that a well regulated malitia is necessary for the security of a free state. It does not state that armed citizens are necessary.

    Before you bring up DC vs Heller, please first address how using originalism to rewrite the constitution is reasonable by an appellate court.

  • Your lemon curd is full of thickener (egg yolk) and sugar (honey) too.

    What thickener did they use? Soy lecithin? That's the same thickener as found in your egg yolks.

    What sugar? Just regular sugar? That has a similar glycemic index as honey.

    Concentrated lemon juice is just lemon juice without the water. Was there also water in the recipe?

    Sounds like your stomach trouble was due to something else. I'm not saying the lemon curd you bought was good quality, but it probably wasn't much different than what you make. And those scary ingredients are the same as the ones that you already use.

  • His supposed comments use fairly sophisticated grammar, much beyond what he's demonstrated before. Also, the tweets are well time towards people who might be feeling resentful and alone right now. People who might be spending extra time online the last two nights because they don't have anything else to do.

    Why isn't the story about that?

  • Originally, I thought you were a troll, but I think you are sincere. It seems that we largely agree on what the court is supposed to do. However, I think you may have misunderstood my statements and the role of the Supreme Court.

    Granted, I'm not a Con Law scholar, so I might be wrong. So if you have a hobbyist interest like I do, I'd suggest two podcasts: Opening Arguments, and "What Can Trump Teach Us About Con Law". Both are well researched, entertaining, and informative.

  • The Supreme Court is supposed to rule on the constitutuonality of laws passed by the legislature. The court has no power to make laws.

    Making a decision about the legality of medication is judicial overreach. That power is granted to congress alone, unless they have delegated some of that power to the executive branch (such as through the FDA).

  • I'm a different person than you replied to. You are both correct.

    When we, Americans, vote for president we vote for an individual by their name on the ballot. Technically, we're voting for electors who have been chosen by our candidate. Those electors get to vote for the actual presidency and can technically change their vote (relative to the popular vote), but in many places they would be penalized for doing so. To my knowledge there have been few, possibly no, legal cases which have tested these laws or systems. So in practicality it doesn't matter.

  • I love Star Wars for its stories, but I don't think a SW reskin is that interesting. There are a few places where I could see it maybe working because the SW setting could justify additional gameplay elements (city - > star system builders with a heavy automation and trade components, sekiro-like).

    Instead we need SW games that tell their own stories well in a modern format. That does not mean a KOTOR remake. The bioware format had its time, but a remake in the same style is going to feel dated by the time it comes out.