This bill does not do what anyone seems to think it will regarding cellphones. As written, nearly every cellphone already being made falls within the scope of the law as already having a "user-replaceable" battery. This matters so much more for other electronics than it does cellphones.
The law doesn't touch on that at all my man. Commercially available tools and without the use of solvents or thermal energy. You may not consider that user replaceable but that's the law as written. And that's able to be done currently on the overwhelming majority of cell phones. In other devices it is a major change, but even this thread is "Smartphones".
You don't. You're highly likely going to go through some big psychological changes as you age that will probably cause perspective shifts about just who you are and what you want. And that's biological. You're going to experience other things that aren't biological products that cause perspective shifts. You at 18 and you at 35 should be two fairly different people.
Hopefully you can find something that you continue to enjoy throughout life. If not it's really not a big deal. Do what you have to, take opportunities given to you as they arise and you'll probably end up somewhere you never expected. Work is work is work. Even if you love the field you can still hate work. It's easier to make a change in career than to pigeonhole yourself into something that presents no way to diversify.
I think you're right. They then quickly learned that it's in their best interest to have a sealed system. Makes it cheaper to obtain higher IP ratings. Sells more devices. It obviously did nothing that hurt sales. Samsung is making an IP68 rated device with replaceable battery and still takes SD cards right now. It's only $600 to boot making it handedly cheaper than flagships. So why isn't it what everyone's pointing at in these threads? Cause the majority of people, even in these very threads, aren't buying it. These are not the factors that decided buying a phone. Otherwise removable batteries, SD cards and 3.5mm jacks would still be ubiquitous, but here we are.
I think they're already complying. Tri-tip bits are already bought easily and affordably on Amazon. Same with suction cups, picks and tweezers. Literally $30 or less to get all of the above in one nifty carrying case. If you have suction cups then you can break the screen seal without using heat and let's be honest, hair dryers are perfectly adequate for these repairs. It's literally what I use for friends and family repairs that I do at home rather than in my workshop.
I think it's a step in the right direction but not even remotely strong enough to force change on current cell phones.
I have been waiting for this ever since the old memes starting cropping up. I dunno why but I consider this "the" OG meme. There were a few before it, but this was the absolute beginning of meme culture as we know it today.
Can someone please just take me back to Barrens Chat, ytmnd and 4chan's /b/? Just for a few minutes?
I support replaceable batteries, I do. But I want one person to show me all the cellphone models that are going to have to change their design to comply with this law. No device I have done this repair on is affected. You don't have to have thermal energy, and all the bits and picks needed are already available for $30 or less. So I'm seriously failing to understand just why people keep conflating this with cellphones when they already are abiding by this
You now own every single tool needed to replace an iPhone battery. They are absolutelty not difficult to obtain.
I mean I get it. Most of us here are tech savvy and capable. Would I tell my mom to do this herself? My girlfriend? 75% of people on the street? No to all the above. But don't come in here and say something as blatantly false as "Apple has made [a lot of tools] difficult to obtain". That is a bald faced lie and you do a bigger disservice to your argument when you add such a statement to it.
Apple, Google, LG, Samsung didn't staple waterproof ratings until ~2016. Even in 2016 it was each of the above's flagships that were guaranteed to be IP67+.
To say waterproof was common in the removable battery era is just not true. Water resistant wasn't even that common. You had to go out of your way to get anything that was IP6X rated.
You can go buy a phone that's IP68 rated with a removal battery right now, Samsung no less. But that's beside the point. You give a manufacturer additional overheard and they will absolutely use it to justify an increased price that it absolutely unproportional to their cost increase. I'm not trying to make the argument that that's a good reason against the idea of this. But I am telling you that they will use IP ratings as a price point.
And honestly, I wanna reiterate that as written, every manufacturer already exists comfortably within this law. The tools are easily had and you don't HAVE to apply thermal energy. You should, but the fact that it CAN be done without is all the manufacturers need to sidestep this.
They could have been, but they absolutely weren't. IP ratings weren't ubiquitous until 2015-2016. You can buy an IP68 with a removable battery right now, but hardly anyone does. It's not a flagship.
Further, there's nothing in this bill to suggest that it will force manufacturers to go back to the old days of a removable backplate and plug and play batteries. I'd bet you'd be hard pressed to find a device that runs afoul of the bill's language right now.
Boom, $20, every tool needed. Hits the commercially available clause. You don't have to have a heat gun (it certainly helps). If people want to fight it, then you're going to have a weaker screen because the glue loosens easier with heat because the alternative is a glue that is weaker at regular temps. IP ratings are included now, they'll be a price point after this if that issue is forced. Should it be? No, removable batteries with IP68 are made right now, but when has a manufacturer ever needed a halfway decent excuse to raise prices?
Edited: spoke before I researched. Don't be like me.
Oh no, I agree with you entirely. That's my point, I know it's safer than ever and yet I still want that connection. You can call that paranoia, I call it an overabundance of caution for the soul that means most to me. How my parents did it without that connection during a time that wasn't safe by comparison is amazing to me.
I'm not worried about my child's safety in terms of other people. I'm worried because I know all the dumb, outright dangerous shit I did as a child and that they are as predisposed as I am.
Between Minisforum and Beelink putting out NUC-likes with AMD, Intel just can't compete. I'm biased in favor of team red to begin with, but you just cannot tell me an Intel NUC provides better per dollar value than the above's offerings. I've used NUCs, I like NUCs, but why pay more for less when there exist alternatives?
I love nvme, personally. On the board is always better, and one screw is even easier than four. Because of nvme the only thing holding back SFF in the average use case is power supplies, and bricked cords are decent enough in the meantime.
Bobert @ Bobert @sh.itjust.works Posts 1Comments 124Joined 2 yr. ago
This bill does not do what anyone seems to think it will regarding cellphones. As written, nearly every cellphone already being made falls within the scope of the law as already having a "user-replaceable" battery. This matters so much more for other electronics than it does cellphones.