Blue_Morpho @ Blue_Morpho @lemmy.world

Posts

5

Comments

2,403

Joined

2 yr. ago

Boycotting Tesla isn't performative. Elon owns 12% of Tesla. Tesla's net profit per car is $8k. 12% of $8k is $960. Tesla stock has a PE ratio of 200x. $960 x 200 = $192,000.

That's right, every Tesla sold is worth $192,000 to Elon in stock value.

Elon uses that value to support Trump and overthrow Democracy worldwide.

I got a set, tried to use them twice and they failed both times. In the first try the bolt metal was too hard for the extrator to bite in in any reasonable time drilling and the second time the screw was too soft and the extractor stripped the hole the extractor makes attempting to extract.

There was no mention of AI?

Les Nessman from WKRP in Cincinnati?

It's your claim that Anonymous would do anything when they won't and do it by AI poisoning that's absurd.

If your initial claim was, "It would be a shame if someone hacked their local police." it wouldn't have sounded like you just watched Mr. Robot.

This article says it is local cameras installed by local police that are being used for ice by the local police department.

Claiming anonymous could do anything about it by poisoning AI models is absurd. Then you call out the skeptic for watching too much TV?

Besides, Anonymous hasn't done anything significant in 10 years They dos'ed Israel last year. Did it do anything? Was one less Palestinian killed?

That's Les Grossman.

He grew up in New York and only recently moved. He's got that New York attitude. Yeah it's off putting.

Forward it to Louis Rossman. He'll make an entire video about it and add it to the wiki tracking these scummy companies.

Just a reminder that Epstein was killed when Trump was president. Trump's attorney general was William Barr. Barr's dad was very close friends with Epstein, gave Epstein his first job, and Barr's dad wrote pedo scifi as a hobby.

I don't get the, "obey laws of physics." Variable focus reflective optics are a thing. Both by moving the mirror distance or by using fancy materials to change the curvature of the mirror.

I don't know the game but I recognized the screen shot as movie star Robert Pattinson too!

Funny how media can stretch realism to the point that a movie star known for being handsome is considered "normal".

You still don't understand the links you are providing. Fuck, just read the English words even if you don't understand the math.

"We aim to present reversible systems which lie on the border of solvability/integrability and chaos."

The intro says it's not chaotic but a function that borders on chaotic.

"We adjusted the precision in such a way that the true initial data and the result of this round trip did not differ by more than 10−3."

Their function isn't even reversible but only allows for an approximation of reversibility.

Conclusion:

"We have shown that there exist infinite families of rational maps which, at the same time, have positive algebraic entropy, present features of chaos, and are solvable."

FEATURES OF CHAOS ISN'T CHAOS.

It's implicit in the method. There also isn't a definition of computability in the papers or Wikipedia because it assumes you have a basic understanding.

Chaotic functions require that you iteratively step through them because they aren't closed form.

"For chaotic systems the evolution equations always include nonlinear terms,5 which makes “closed-form” solutions of these equations impossible—roughly, a closed-form solution is a single formula that allows one to simply plug in the time of the desired prediction into the equation and determine the state of the system at that time."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/chaos-theory#%3A%7E%3Atext=For+chaotic+systems+the+evolution%2Cthe+state+of+the+system

I last wrote a paper on chaos in a mechanical system 35 years but I haven't forgotten the basics.

"one personality shift"

That's everyone dude. "Bernie Sanders is one personality shift away from being a Maga tech bro."

'Robert L. Devaney, says that to classify a dynamical system as chaotic, it must have these properties:[22]

it must be sensitive to initial conditions, it must be topologically transitive, it must have dense periodic orbits. " https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

f(x)=x^{y doesn't satisfy those 3 conditions. Nor does the paper you linked say that x}y is a chaotic equation.

That function in the paper cannot be solved for an input because of its sensitivity to initial input. He used a computer to simulate the time steps. He couldn't immediately calculate any point on the the plot like y^x.

No closed form solution is one property. It's not wrong, only incomplete. But if a system of equations had a closed form solution, it wouldn't be called chaotic. For example any exponential equation like x^y is extremely sensitive to initial conditions yet it isn't chaotic.

A double pendulum is bound by definition! It is a fixed point, a line with a 2 axis joint, and another line. That's the definition.

Just because a system is chaotic doesn't mean it can move in unlimited ways. A chaotic pendulum cannot move outside it's predefined limits of its geometry despite being chaotic.

The real world imposes far more constraints. A double pendulum starts out in a known state. It gets pushed. It moves chaotically for a minute, then returns to its original rest state.

In the context of Hitler's parents, you shove the dad, he moves chaotically for a second, then goes back to walking. No long term change has happened.

Chaos means that a small change in initial conditions can lead to drastically different places in the long term

Yes, what I was trying to explain is that it could (no closed form) but doesn't necessarily mean that is must. A chain with 2 segments is a double pendulum, the classic simple chaotic system. If you hold a piece of chain and give it a light tap, it will move chaotically for a few seconds and then come back to rest. The system will not have changed. Even with a hard push, the chain can't move beyond the limit of the links.

If you gave Hitler's dad a push, he would stumble for a second (chaotically), then go back to walking (return to initial state). Nothing would change.

A tiny change could mean a big change but it doesn't mean that change must be unlimited. For example a double pendulum is a classic chaotic system. There is no solution but that doesn't mean the pendulum can move greater than the length of its segments. It's still a bound system.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

More importantly, in the real world, if you push a double pendulum, it won't flail endlessly. It will eventually converge to the single state of rest.