Plastic Straws. Plastic cups. Wrapping indvidual food items in plastic and then putting them in a larger plastic bag which you carry home in an even larger plastic bag.
Is that before or after someone noticed their $8B in savings was $8m? Or before they had to rehire all those departments they fired before they realized they were critical?
Every body persists in its state of being at rest or moving uniformly straight forward, unless it is compelled to change its state by force impressed.
Corrected translation:
Every body persists in its state of being at rest or moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by force impressed.
There's no change in meaning.
'Except insofar' is a perfect synonym of 'unless'.
The problem is the kvm isn't emulating edid. It's a horrible problem that shouldn't exist. It makes most kvms useless. It's not mentioned in reviews that most kvms sold don't actually work.
Look for a kvm that supports edid emulation and does it with the resolution/refresh that you need ( for example DP 1.4)
The first Linux I used wasn't part of any distro. A few years later I compiled Slackware to run bind and Sendmail.
Last year I tried Arch in a VM. I got to where it expected me to know what partitions to create for root and swap and noped out. It's not 1996. I don't have time for those details any more. No one should. Sane defaults have been in other distros for decades.
ignores the fact that multiple shots-at-different-exposures-combined-at-print-time has been used in film for nearly as long as we've had film cameras.
Multi shot for HDR in film is restricted to still life because film is very slow compared to digital. There's no film camera that will automatically change the stops to make that feasible. So it's take a shot, adjust settings, take another, adjust settings. At the low and high end you'd need to swap film stock between shots.
@Blue_Morpho responded about how film is so bad that Kubrik choose digital,
??? I said to achieve low light performance on FILM, Kubrick needed a lens that was (and is) so special that only 10 exist in the world. What was possible for Kubrick using extraordinarily rare and expensive equipment is achieved by anyone with a common digital camera today.
So while you can find references to film that matches digital, it is so extreme that it isn't valid. It would be like someone using the cryogenic cooled sensor in the $10B Webb telescope for their argument.
Film is so bad in low light that Kubrick had to obtain 3 of the 10 NASA lenses to film Barry Lyndon. Any modern digital can take better low light pictures than the best film.
He gets due process. A hearing is held and it's legally determined if his citizenship should be revoked.