Bloomcole @ Bloomcole @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

700

Joined

5 mo. ago

Bcs it's garbage

He is indeed a revisionist or more probably ignorant and stupid from seeing his other comments.
In this case the wiki article looks OK but I stand by my claim about Wikipedia.
It's useful to look up stuff about flowers, geography, mathematics and other stuff.
But if the subject has the slightest political relevance it can't be trusted.

hope you crash

You are OC not right, especially since you're putting words into my mouth I didn't say.
Clearly mentioning facts that show you are wrong on WW1 Germany is not 'defending them'.

"Russia’s invasion doesn’t have an historical conect they’re inherently evil "
Again didn't say anything like that, only that it has nothing to do with WW1

Now we're funding the US regime war machine after they blew up NS2 and 'sanctions'.
Paying extortion prices for dirty US fracking gas that make companies uncompetitive and causing the economy to collapse.
The US leeches always profit from war, same as in WW2.

Hey, our government is not licking the US/pissrahell genocider boot any less is it?

That DE40 has not been going up since the terrorist act by the US of blowing up NS2 and the 'sanctions' on themselves making them buy wildly expensive fracking gas from the US.
EU can't compete and their economy is dying.
BASF, Thyssen-Krupp,etc... all closing down shop and reorganising.
A nice fertile ground for creating more AfD fascists, exactly the same as in the 1930's.
And again the prospect of getting trashed on the eastern front just like their opa's.

1 Wikipedia is a garbage source.
2 Russia/Ukraine has nothing to do with it.

What are you saying? Definitely not 'caused by'.
It was caused by many factors and events.
This was a result and not a cause.
You are also completely wrong that 'Nobody was fighting before that'.
There was already fighting in eastern Europe.

If it's 'paid' someone made money.
German arms peddlers to be exact.
Whoever pays the bill: government (the suckers voting for them and the ones that didn't too) doesn't matter.

The US and Israel have a partnership.
While the zionist representation is very visible in US politics and creates the belief that they contol it it is not so.
Can you honestly believe that if you objectively compare the two?
A tiny country with a small population and a small army (despite again being disproportionally and relatively big) vs a huge country with the largest military in the world that was already a world power before the other even existed.

" doing whatever is good for Israel and is inevitably bad for the US"
Can you give an example?

If you're thinking now that the bad thing is israel may drag the US into war with Iran you're mistaken.
That may happen but it's bcs it is the US intention to have war on Iran.
They have provoked them many times all on their own without using the israel proxy.
Hijacking ships, small attacks and unilaterally breaking the nuclear deal, etc. to increase tension.

Anyway here's a good article I recently read.
Whatever is happening now has long been predicted.

"Did you just …downvote and run away from the question? It was an honest question."

I sometimes sleep, and never run away from a discussion if it's civil or useful.
Which is rare here since .world is infested with reactionary clowns throwing insults and platitutes when they lose an argument.

Let me know what you think.

Always on the wrong side of history.
Not a coincidence that fascism and zionism are twins

In this case the colonising is still going on, hence the genocide. They are not ‘citizens’ but colonisers.
It's not an unfortunate fait accompli like the US that eradicated the original inhabitants for instance.

Someone made the same point so answered this already to show it is an invalid argument in the case of Palestine.

That is your view.
I disagree.

I don't see many ethnic Egyptians in places of power that can influence policy or get laws voted concerning their country.
Egypt hasn't always been loyal, certainly not the population.
They overthrew the previous puppet despite US efforts to keep him in place.
When they saw it was hopeless they threw him under the bus and 'supported' the arab spring movement.
In reality they hijacked the revolution and simply put another puppet in place.

It's also a geographically beneficial located proxy.

I hope you are being naive.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/11/9/poll-53-israelis-support-extrajudicial-killings.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-half-of-jewish-israelis-say-israel-should-run-gaza-after-the-war-0-say-hamas/

Plenty of jews outside the apartheid state are against it.
Those that live there, wether bcs of propaganda or a superiority complex don't.
Maybe 5 to 10% maximum have normal views.
You know what they say about people trying the same thing and expecting different results.

No sorry, LGBT is not particularly my interest.
Maybe go on Lemmygrad and ask them directly.
A few hours ago there were some discussing the attacks.

Every government before him was the same, they're not 'hypothetical'. Ridiculous argument.
What doesn't exist is a reality where the next government isn't brutally mistreating Palestine.
Your hasbara is weak