Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BL
BloodForTheBloodGod @ BloodForTheBloodGod @lemmy.ca
Posts
0
Comments
113
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • CIA loves tankies. Once they've (the tankie reactionaries) destroyed a revolution and installed a corrupt kleptocracy in the orifice of it's bloating corpse, the conditions are perfect for either restoration of the old - or for a supposedly people's regime to exploit workers as bad as before.

    Tankies are counter revolutionary reactionaries. GTFO.

  • If you don't live there, then -

    Yes, housing should be held in common. Don't worry though. The whole idea of no one should be homeless or starve applies to you, too.

    And if you live there, built it, should be yours. But rent is parasitic and has to go as a concept.

  • It's exploitation, because housing is a right that shouldn't be monetized.

    But you do have cause to see this as fine. Exactly why hurting you is extremist, authoritarian nonsense in my book.

    And don't worry too much. The whole idea of revolution is that no one should be unhoused. You'll have a place to go.

    Just don't join a death squad.

  • To be clear you don't deserve to exploit others, and BUY is hugely different to BUILT.

    But unless you join a rightist paramilitary death squad in defense of "your" property "rights", I'm not about to be cool with someone killing you.

  • That they are doing unproductive unwork? And shouldn't continue doing that? Sure.

    Renting out a house is unethical, sure. But it doesn't warrant death. Their social and economic situation is NOTHING like the feudal and near feudal land lords of pre revolutionary China and Russia.

    Also, here's your reminder that Mao's parents were landlords.