BlitzoTheOisSilent @ BlitzoTheOisSilent @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

274

Joined

1 yr. ago

Minus the 2+ weeks they take for the holidays.

Correct: I have had two jobs where I only worked 32 hours/week, but was considered a full time employee with benefits and all that.

However, just because your employer considers you full-time doesn't mean other organizations will. When I was getting my mortgage, it was with one of those 32 hr/week jobs, and my loan company would not sign off on an approval until I could show a paystub with 40 hours/week.

I told them I'm considered full time at my company at 32 hours, and they basically said that's great, but their policy is 40.

Funny way to apologize to someone for unjustly calling them a Nazi.

Edit: Eh, I'll just save us both the headache (moreso me) and drag is blocked. Bye drag and the victim complex you hide behind, from this nAzI to you.

Still waiting for my apology.

Ok drag, yep, you're right.

Still waiting for my apology.

Ah, I misread that, fair point. 👍

I've exchanged dozens of comments with drag, drag is a snowflake troll. In all of our interactions, I misgendered drag once and drag immediately capitulated on it and acts like I've maliciously set out to torture drag for making a mistake, once. Drag then turned on me for defending drag's pronouns in a discussion about how many feel new and modern pronouns don't deserve respect, claiming I am lying about drags pronouns and only did it to hurt drag.

But drag refuses to apologize for calling me a Nazi, or any of the other insults drag has hurled at me, because drag feels I'm a Nazi for criticizing Harris/the DNC despite me being a trans veteran who voted for Harris.

Don't engage with drag.

Called it.

Oh, I'm sorry, drag is right, drag didn't call me a Trump supporter, drag only called me a Nazi. Though, I distinctly remember you telling me I wanted you and all of your friends dead, but you aren't worth any more time looking because you'll use whatever mental gymnastics you need to to continue to feel that you're right about everything.

The rest of your comment is meaningless, drag, I didn't purposefully misgender you, and I thought I corrected it before you saw via an edit. It wasn't malicious, and if it was, why would I be referring to you as drag in every other instance I refer to you?

Utterly meaningless, much like what you provide to literally every discussion you've been involved in. I clearly laid out my reasoning behind why Buddhism is a spiritual practice as opposed to a religion, including the fact that, by definition, religion requires the worship of a superhuman ability, primarily through a God or God's, which Buddhism does not have, as I pointed out in my first comment.

I like how you are throwing a temper tantrum because I accidentally misgendered you in one comment out of the dozens you and I have exchanged, yet I already know you're not going to apologize for unjustly calling me a Nazi because that's somehow justified in your empty head.

You are a child, drag, and you need to get over yourself. I wasn't insulting Buddhism, I was trying to show you how it doesn't meet the definition of a religion. And in turn, you're now defending atheism, or attacking atheism, (you're writing makes zero sense), and I never claimed that Buddhism is perfect. It's not an organized religion, it's just not, idk why you're doubling down on this when you are just wrong.

And for the record, I am an atheist, you insufferable bag of hot air, and your comment doesn't lend you the credibility you think it does. Nor did I ever claim to be a good person.

I'm done, drag, any time I see you from now on will only be to demand my apology, with a link to the screenshot for all of Lemmy to see what an insufferable, miserable child Drag really is.

For the insufferable child who can't admit they're wrong:

https://lemmy.world/comment/13732345

I already did.

I'm still waiting for you to apologize for calling me a fascist Nazi Trump supporter who wants you and all of your friends dead, but I guess that would involve you admitting you were wrong about anything, and I know that's impossible for someone like drag.

Edit: I'm waiting...

Y know what, fuck it, I'm so sick of this. I'm actually attempting to defend you and Buddhism here, and I'm getting this nonsense pedantic questioning.

You're right, Buddhism is a religion, and it's a shit poison just like every other religion, and you've proved that. Hurray for Drag, once again proving drag's superior intellect over everyone on Lemmy.

Edit: Absolutely insufferable, and to think I was defending your pronouns in another thread too, despite you being an insufferable tool.

Edit 2: I'd link the whole write up, but you'd probably start pedantically arguing against my point because you're just the smartest fucking person in the world.

In Wagner’s estimation, it takes 13 milliseconds for the brain to process information from the eye, a hundred milliseconds to feel pain. But 13 milliseconds into the implosion, there is nothing left intact of the cylindrical section of the Titan.

“They would have been dead ten milliseconds ago,” says Wagner. “They wouldn’t really feel anything or see anything coming. They would just be instantly dead

Source

I'm claiming Buddhism isn't a religion at all, it's a spiritual practice.

It's a spiritual practice, an ideology or philosophy, there's no centralized Buddhist religion with an unelected figurehead dictating your "religion." You can buy a pillow and watch some YouTube videos on Buddhist practices, and you're a Buddhist so long as you follow the ideology and practices. There's no weekly check-ins at the church, no needing to pass certain coming-of-age rights, no baptisms or indoctrination ceremonies, no pressure to convert those around you.

But I wouldn't call you religious, I'd call you spiritual. You're attempting to gain an enlightened and spiritual connection with the world/universe around you. You're not trying to appease a God in the hopes you'll be granted an eternal afterlife, and following every single religious rule/practice is the only way to ensure that.

Better to be judged by twelve than carried by six. To me, it's solid advice (so long as the individual can own a firearm responsibly, which is an individual decision) for individuals of minority groups to arm themselves.

The majority of situations will be like the other commenter said: arm yourself to protect yourself against groups looking to do you harm. It won't surprise me to hear about groups of bigots rolling up on LGBTQ+ clubs and following people home to attack/assault/kill them, or if we see more Pulse Nightclub shooting events.

Remember, Reagan pushed for gun control as the Gov of California only after the Black Panthers started carrying weapons to their rallies. Yeah, push comes to shove, the police/government have way bigger and better weapons than the average American.

But that was true back then too, and it still scared the government enough to pass firearm restrictions. Peaceful protests can remain a lot more peaceful when the police know the other side is packing too. (I say CAN because obviously once weapons are introduced to any situation, violence is introduced as a potential consequence)

No one wants to be the first one shot, even if you've got a tank/machine gun behind you as backup.

I've always heard Buddhism referred to more as a spiritual practice than a religious one. Buddhism has no "deity," the Buddha would not have condoned the worship of himself as a God. Buddhism's whole thing deals with karma and the path the self enlightenment, which is the key difference between Buddhism (and other spiritual "religions"): spirituality is self contained, religion isn't.

Per most actual religions, you need to worship in certain places, listening to certain people, and many religions encourage the conversion of those outside of the religion (sometimes by force). The community aspect is a requirement of the religion, it's not considered "kosher" to just do it all by yourself in your house.

And thus, these religions tend to be organized: they have a hierarchy, a power structure, hell, some ever have their own governments/countries. They protect their own, shielding them from the law despite their pedophilic transgressions (cough cough Catholicism), they require tithes or their patrons but rarely offer financial assistance to their own parishes.

Buddhism can be practiced in groups (monks and monasteries), but those groups are not forcefully trying to convert outsiders (though they may welcome them), and they aren't necessary. You can practice Buddhism entirely on your own and still be faithfully practicing all of the tenets of the "religion," despite never interacting with any type of significant religious figures.

I've never met a Buddhist who sat down next to me at dinner and started asking when I'm going to accept Buddha and start going to meditation and find my inner chakra and give up all of my possessions for the pursuit of pure enlightenment, or tell me I'm going to reincarnate as a disfigured creature because I'm trans.

I have been told by various folks of various Abrahamic-Religion flavors that I'm going to hell for being trans, need to repent/kill myself, been asked when I'm going back to church, how I can turn my back on my creator, told religion will fix my depression/mental issues, and so on.

And the fact that the majority of religions rely on the indoctrination of children for their member base to remain consistent/strong enough, rather than allowing people to find their teachings and accept/deny them for themselves when they can consent as adults, should tell you most religions are more akin to cults than anything actually beneficial to society.

Finding out who the true allies are to the LGBTQ+ community.

Once I lose my VA disability, I'll be priced out of existing, I won't be able to afford my debt, mortgage, bills, and then food and such. I'd have to double my income overnight, and I have zero training or certifications or degrees beyond an AS in General Studies, so it's not going to happen.

I'm less worried about the national guard than I am about local law enforcement across the country, Trump will give them the green light with impunity.

My biggest fear, though? They're going to ban all LGBTQ+-related healthcare using the same mechanisms as the Federal Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984. "Sure, the states can choose the drinking age types of LGBTQ+ healthcare they offer in their state... They just won't have access to federal funding if it isn't 21 absolutely none."

I know who you're talking about, drag, drag has called me a racist, Trump supporting fascist who wants drag and all of drags friends dead because I had the audacity to criticize Harris and the DNC. Drag backed off that when I pointed out to drag that I'm a trans veteran who voted for Harris.

I've never had difficulty understanding drag, and as much as I think drag is full of hot air, I respect drag enough as a fellow human to refer to drag in drag's preferred way. Drag is using the third person, this has been a trope in popular media for years and no one has complained about it.

Did y'all have a hard time relating to and understanding The Boulder in Avatar the Last Airbender? He refers to himself as "The Boulder" instead of his pronouns, where's the uproar around that?

Let's take it to real life: I googled it, pro wrestlers The Rock, The Big Guy, Santina Marella, Kanyon, and Stone Cold Steve Austin all regularly used the third person to refer to themselves. They used other pronouns as well, I'm not denying that, but you all act like this is some completely unheard of new thing that only these woke leftists are doing.

It's respect, full stop. It's the equivalent of someone saying their name is Rajesh and you say, "Eh, Steve is easier, I'm used to the name Steve, I can't pronounce whatever you just said so the only way we're equals is if I can just call you Steve." That's insane, y'all need to stop making excuses as to why showing respect to another individual is sooooooo hard.

And FYI, in writing this, I only had to go back and make three changes where I used an improper pronoun in when referring to drag. Again, if I can show basic respect to someone who called me a fascist nazi, why can't y'all do it for your friends, family, and coworkers? It's not hard, and I'm 30, so it's not like I was brought up with zhe/zher/zhers and all this other stuff either my entire childhood, I didn't learn what transgender was until I was in the Navy.

Edit: Drag told me I insulted drag and lied to Lemmy by defending drag here, so I've crossed it out and will let drag defend drag's pronouns alone. Drag doesn't want my help because, in drag's own words, I'm a Nazi who purposefully misgendered drag and only wrote the above to insult and hurt drag.

Yet refuses to apologize for falsely calling me a Nazi:

We're still in the growing pains version of it, though, where there are far too many people taking advantage of a legitimate position just for the attention.

I would argue "who cares?" And please, explain to me how many "far too many" is? Because the trans population makes up under 1% of the US population, so I'm really trying to wrap my head around <1% is "far too many" of anything.

This is just excuses, I'm sorry. I get "zhe/zher/zhers" is awkward to see, but watch this: "Debra is amazing, have you had zher apple pie?"

Phew, nearly suffered an aneurysm on that one. 🙄

Another issue is that there is a component of needing to be vocal and firm or no one will take you seriously, but it's a fine line between that and being obnoxious and over-asking....reminding someone who wants to be considerate is good, being offended at someone intentionally mis-labeling may be necessary, but being offended by honest mistakes or berating someone for not realizing zhe or zher or some newly defined label was a thing definitely hurts the cause.

First, your last line is bullshit, it's the same logic that's been used for every single oppressed group asking for basic respect from their oppressors.

When women standing up against sexual harassment really started to gain national attention, the news anchors made the exact same arguments you're making now. "Oh, it's just a man being friendly! Now men won't want to hire women because they'll be sued! We've behaved this way for decades and now it's a problem? God, Debbie is such a cunt for reporting me for rubbing her shoulders, I was just trying to be nice!"

When women reported it, it was often, "They're just looking for a payout/attention! Why didn't they bring this up for the last X amount of time?! Why do women have to be so rude about it?!"

When gay marriage was being fought for, what did we hear? "Oh, can't they keep that behind closed doors? It just makes me uncomfortable, I don't think the children should see that! It's always been Adam and Eve for me, I'm 40 years old, how am I supposed to learn to use the word "partner" instead of "husband/wife"?!"

Notice how it's always the oppressed who are asking for too much, always? Always, it's always the oppressed asking for too much. But when they say, "Hey, society, can you do XYZ to show me some basic dignity and respect?" what are we met with?

"We're still in the growing pains, people are taking advantage, we need to be patient, you need to know your place and when it's ok to speak up, but make sure you know the correct amount to speak up, otherwise they have the right to just not respect you."

For fucking words, that's what y'all are doubling down on, something that costs you no money or effort beyond treating someone like a person, and respecting their reasonable request. They're not asking for you to paint their face from memory, or have their star-chart memorized and they yell at you for not knowing that Mercury was in retrograde, or chastising you for not knowing the exact date and time they were born.

If they've introduced themselves and their pronouns, and you can't be bothered to respect that, you're just a dick at best and transphobic at worst. It's really that simple, it's a sign of respect, and any excuse for why you can't use words is just an excuse to disrespect those you don't feel deserve it. And that's an internal issue the individual needs to get over, but the LGBTQ+ community doesn't need to coddle a society that can't be bothered to show them the respect of using proper pronouns.

Okay, first of all, if you counted how many pronouns you use, per day, it would likely surprise you. Second, it once again, costs you nothing to use someone's pronouns after they've been identified to you. If you're arguing "it's not fair to be yelled at for something you aren't aware of" then that's completely reasonable.

If your argument is "I don't want to be bothered learning 3 new words in a language I've spoken my entire life," then I have no sympathy for you, and you're at best just someone who's disrespectful to those they (WOW I used they as a singular, THAT was hard, cost me $400 to write that just now) don't feel deserve respect. It's that simple.

If someone introduces themselves as Jennifer, and you immediately start calling them Jen/Jenny/Etc, and they ask tell you it's Jennifer, do you double down because, well, Jen is just easier, Jen is just easier, I'll just stop bringing up Jen.

Perhaps an undesirable outcome is that if the pronoun is a hurdle to overcome, it's easier for Bob just not to bring Sally up at all, a possibly unfortunate result because it might have been an interesting conversation that is now simply avoided.

And then you sit there, while explaining this to me, and act like what you're describing isn't blatant discrimination. The exact same "LoGiC" that has been used to discriminate against "difficult women," y'know, the ones that were sexually harassed in the workplace for decades.

How did the News react to women standing up against harassment and discrimination in the workplace? Oh, that's right, they said things like, "Well, now men aren't going to promote women into managerial positions because they'll be afraid of being sued! Now men can't even have conversations with their coworkers without fear of reprimand! Won't anyone think of how the poor men feel?!"

Notice a pattern? It's always the oppressed asking too much, because they don't understand the undo burden of checks notes for this discussion not harassing women and, wow, big ask here, using the names and preferred pronouns of your coworkers.

You're right, I didn't think how hard that must be on the average person, completely unreasonable ask on the part of the LGBTQ+ community, next they'll want equal rights under the law! Disgusting. 🙄