BringMeTheDiscoKing @ Bleach7297 @lemmy.ca

Dead or alive

---

Read more

Posts

7

Comments

289

Joined

2 yr. ago

FAAAAAMILY VAAAALUUUUUUEEEES

I would feel like you answered my substantive response with a question about breakfast, and given your track record on analogies I thought I'd just skip the part where I try to figure out if it makes sense and ask you the answer directly.

You're one of these people who seems to think the world works how they think it should work.

How would YOU feel?

I one heard ast describe Linux's code quality as 'marginal' (presumably speaking of the kernel)

Of course, it was ast talking at BSDCan but still, harsh words from a master.

No I rejected it on the basis that fraud is currently illegal.

It doesn't matter if it remains illegal. You get tried for things that are currently illegal. If they decide to repeal those laws about investor fraud, then your comparison to pot users makes sense. AFTER they repeal those laws Donald might be able to seek some recourse. And right after that you can kiss the economy goodbye, since it's all built on investor confidence.

And saying that some states have 'legalized fraud' basically shows that you don't understand or accept the legal definition of fraud.

My God, are you literally this stupid or are you being paid to pretend you are?

No and no

They key phrase is "they made it... legal."

Your thought exercise is about something legal that used to be illegal. Has fraud suddenly become legal? No? So what's your point? Your 'lying on a resume' example made more sense, even if it was ridiculous.

Bleach7295 fun fact: I used to think it was said 'tangenitally.' But that's actually what you get on a nudist beach or something.

This has been a Bleach7293 fun fact.

Being an average law abiding citizen and not an infamous, law breaking billionare, I'm not too worried. See, rules-based societies work great for people who can follow the rules.

Who gives a toss what the banks say? They aren't the real victim, rules based society is.

but you do a good job and your manager just happy with your performance

Here is where the comparison falls apart

Awe c'mon. He was just speeching! Isn't speeching protected? Don't unfree his speech, why you hate liberdom and freedity?

wastefuk

If that was a typo, let it retroactively not be. Wastefuk is a great word, especially how you used it, which I read as adjectivizing 'the habits of a Wastefuk.'

Don't be a wastefuk, everyone. Make your coffee at home. But not with k cups.

I am so sad it isn't.

Imagine replying to a comment that is clearly about relative impacts, and twisting it so that it sounds like the person you are replying to has some sort of fundamental deficiency in how they perceive the world.

How wonderfully ironic!

Seems to me it is when we are on the toilet that we are at our most reasonable.

I also know next to nothing about Taylor Swift, but if her "Swifties" want it, I wouldn't be surprised if she's one of the first jet-setting celebs with a hydrogen or electric aircraft.

I think it would be smart PR, as well as 'the right thing to do,' for her to invest in some companies to help herself (and the rest of us) get to that point.

And then Bibi said he disrespected the memory of 6 million Jews.

No, Bibi. You did that. You've been doing it for years. May God judge you. After you die in a cell.

Get thee behind me, Deceiver.

Wouldn't need large government if people just thought the same way still had VALUES!

The fewer people we have studying society, the better society will be!

Also, drink up! I'm funnier when you do!