Throwaway @ Blamemeta @lemm.ee

Posts

23

Comments

915

Joined

2 yr. ago

Its a cool bit of trivia

I fully agree. Small groups have limited resources. But google and facebook have a ton of resources, they can handle more oversight.

If we did that, there wouldn't be any communists left, because they'd realize it has a number of unsolvable problems.

My personal favorite is theres no mechanism to go from the "tyranny of the proles" stage to the "true communism" stage.

What makes you say that I, specifically, am against education?

No, I don't trust anyone to do that. Everyone should be able to judge for themselves.

To your shopping mall example, you got it wrong. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center_v._Robins

Well yeah, did you read the article?

Fucking tankies thinking inalienable rights are bad things.

If you want to deal with misinformation, at some point someone has to say what misinformation is. Someone has to make a judgement on every fact, every event, every story.

And holy fuck my dude! "Furthermore, "misinformation" and "disinformation" refer to things that can be true!"

Thats some shit straight out of 1984. Censoring true facts? Wtf is wrong with you?

I don't trust facebook to decide what is hate speech and what isn't, if thats what you're saying.

Technically, it's causing a panic that's illegal. Yelling fire is not. https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/28853/is-it-illegal-to-yell-fire-in-a-crowded-theatre

Different states have different laws, of course, and I am not a lawyer, I just googled if it was actually illegal. Don't actually go yelling fire in a crowded theater.

That's a good idea, but I still think big sites are public spaces at this point.

Imo, not really. Juries are still problematic, in much the same way

That brings up another thing. At what point does it become a "public space"?

Theres an old supreme court case on a company town that claimed someone was trespassing on a sidewalk. The supreme court ruled it was a public space, and thus they could pass out leaflets.

https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/marsh-v-alabama-1946/

Imo, a lot of big sites have gotten to that stage, and should be treated as such.

Part of the problem is who decides what is misinformation. As soon as the state gets to decide what is and isn't true, and thus what can and cannot be said, you no longer have free speech.

That sounds like a good label

Yeah thats true. Political group maybe? Not exactly sure how to label them.

Hamas is the organization that runs gaza. Theyre the largest political party in Palestine, they collect taxes, and they have an army. Imagine if the US Army was on the election ballot, and ran the East Coast.

Its essentially the same thing, just "Hamas/Israel" reminds you of what Hamas does, and "Gaza/Israel" is trying to erase that.

We're still making incredible advancements. Have you read the stuff on gravitational waves?

The real issue is that scientists have access to twitter and have the same basic urges as anyone else, the urge to correct the people who are wrong.

Ok, anti-capitalist propaganda.

Probably shouldn't assumed, after all its not like theres a bunch of communists on lemmy, and communism isn't the only alternative to capitalism.

/s

Nah, politics is fine. Communist propaganda like this meme is the real issue.